Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

The Transition to an Anterior-Based Muscle Sparing Approach Improves Early Postoperative Function but is Associated with a Learning Curve
Published on: September 7, 2022
Radiographic Evaluation of Distal Femoral Sagittal Morphology Following Imageless Robotic-Assisted Total Knee
Stefano Marco Paolo Rossi1,2, Guglielmo Miele3, Angelo Carosini3,4
1Orto-Trauma Department, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, 20162 Milano, Italy.
Abstract:
Background: Restoration of native distal femoral sagittal morphology is increasingly recognized as an important goal in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Alterations in anterior femoral offset (AFO), posterior femoral offset (PFO), and anteroposterior (AP) femoral size may affect knee biomechanics and patellofemoral function. This study evaluated whether imageless robotic-assisted TKA performed using a functional alignment (FA) philosophy resulted in statistically significant preoperative-to-postoperative differences in distal femoral sagittal morphology and coronal alignment. Methods: A retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected database included 250 consecutive primary TKAs performed with the imageless ROSA Knee System (Zimmer Biomet) using a tibia-first FA workflow. Preoperative and postoperative radiographic measurements included mechanical hip-knee-ankle angle (mHKA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), AP femoral size, AFO, and PFO. Paired comparisons were performed using appropriate statistical tests. Results: While no statistically significant differences were observed between preoperative and postoperative mean values for overall mechanical alignment (mHKA) (177.1 ± 7.7° vs. 177.3 ± 3.2°, p = 0.11), secondary coronal parameters demonstrated statistically significant controlled adjustments reflecting the patient's individualized functional alignment. No significant differences were observed in sagittal morphology: AP femoral size (70.7 ± 6.3 vs. 71.0 ± 6.2 mm, p = 0.31), AFO (10.7 ± 5.9 vs. 10.8 ± 5.8 mm, p = 0.70), and PFO (34.1 ± 7.6 vs. 34.5 ± 7.2 mm, p = 0.24). Conclusions: Imageless robotic-assisted TKA performed with an FA philosophy and a tibia-first workflow demonstrated minimal mean preoperative-to-postoperative changes in distal femoral sagittal parameters at the cohort level. While overall mean mechanical alignment remained unchanged, secondary coronal parameters showed controlled, statistically significant adjustments, reflecting the implementation of an individualized three-dimensional alignment strategy. These findings support robotic FA as a patient-specific three-dimensional alignment strategy. Further prospective studies are needed to determine whether these radiographic results translate into improved clinical outcomes.