Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Advanced Self-Healing Asphalt Reinforced by Graphene Structures: An Atomistic Insight
Published on: May 31, 2022
GPR-GDMI: A Geometrical Dimension Detection and Morphological Inversion Method of Structural Cracks in Semi-Rigid
Haochuan Zhou1, Fanwen Meng2,3, Jiaqi Li1
1School of Transportation, Southeast University, Tianjin 300461, China.
Abstract:
Structural cracks that develop within semi-rigid asphalt pavement structures may remain concealed beneath the pavement surface, making their opening widths, depths, and morphologies difficult to determine nondestructively. Although ground-penetrating radar (GPR) can localize subsurface reflective cracks, the hyperbolic anomalies in a B-scan, a two-dimensional cross-sectional radar profile obtained from sequential measurements along a survey line, do not directly represent the actual geometrical dimensions of the cracks. To solve this problem, this paper proposes a geometrical dimension detection and morphological inversion (GDMI) method, called the GPR-GDMI. The GPR-GDMI comprises two independently trained networks: GPR-GCDNet for geometrical dimensions detection and GPR-CMIGAN for morphology inversion. GPR-GCDNet utilizes trapezoidal boxes to represent crack dimensions in B-scan, enhanced by directional crack attention (DCA) for hyperbolic pattern extraction, a SetTrap Head for trapezoidal proposal generation, and multi-scale feature fusion for improved receptive field and coverage. GPR-CMIGAN is an unsupervised framework consisting of two independently designed U-Net generators and discriminators, with Gaussian noise injected to prevent mode collapse. The crack-dimension-constrained cycle-consistency loss incorporates GPR-GCDNet's detected dimensions as physical constraints in the inversion, while Wasserstein loss mitigates over-constraints and improves stability during training. On the test set, GPR-GCDNet achieved an AP of 0.84, an F1-score of 0.89, and an mIoU of 0.74 under an IoU threshold of 0.5. GPR-CMIGAN achieved a performance on MS-SSIM, LPIPS, and FID of 0.9984, 0.0566, and 2.3145, respectively. Ablation studies confirm the contribution of each component. By quantitative experiments, GPR-GDMI achieves accurate detection of crack geometrical dimensions and morphological inversion based on field-collected GPR data.
More Related Videos
07:14Tracking Infiltration Front Depth Using Time-lapse Multi-offset Gathers Collected with Array Antenna Ground Penetrating Radar
Published on: May 1, 2018
07:37Full-field Strain Measurements for Microstructurally Small Fatigue Crack Propagation Using Digital Image Correlation Method
Published on: January 16, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Microcracking in Concrete
Design Example: Joints in Concrete Pavements
Contraction joints are typically formed by sawing a groove into the concrete shortly after it has hardened. This creates a weakened vertical plane, deliberately encouraging cracking at...
Masonry Paving
Design Example: Alignment of a Road Line Using GIS
Types of Non-structural Cracks in Concrete
Plastic shrinkage cracks typically form within hours after the concrete is poured. The concrete's surface dries faster than the bottom, creating tensile stress that the still-plastic concrete cannot withstand, leading to diagonal or randomly patterned cracks on the concrete surface.
Plastic...