Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Involving Individuals with Developmental Language Disorder and Their Parents/Carers in Research Priority Setting
Published on: June 6, 2020
The Panel Subgroup (PSG) Method: A Valuable Method for Effectively Engaging Panels in the Development of Practice
Nofisat Ismaila1,2, Brittany E Harvey2, Kaitlin Einhaus2
1Department of Health Research Methods Evidence, and Impact McMaster University Hamilton Ontario Canada.
Background:
Clinical practice guidelines rely on expert panels to review evidence and develop recommendations. The traditional approach of engaging experts often relies on periodic full panel meetings which can lead to slow progress and variability in panel engagement. To address these issues, the ASCO introduced the Panel Subgroup (PSG) method, dividing panels into smaller working groups to enhance engagement, distribute workload, and accelerate guideline development.
Objective:
To evaluate the PSG method on guideline development timelines, its uptake, perceived benefits, challenges, and lessons learned from the perspective of ASCO guideline methodologists.
Methods:
This study had two phases. Phase 1 was a retrospective review of ASCO guideline administrative data (2017-2024) comparing guidelines developed using the traditional or PSG method. Guidelines were included if they were de novo, had over 50 included studies, and complete administrative records. Data extracted included number of panelists, research questions, studies reviewed, subgroups (for PSG), and development time. Phase 2 involved qualitative interviews with methodologists who used the PSG method to explore experiences, benefits, and challenges.
Results:
Sixteen guidelines met the inclusion criteria: seven used the traditional method and nine used the PSG method. The average development time was 13 months (SD, 2.41) for the PSG method compared to traditional (23 months; SD, 6.30). PSG uptake among methodologists was 75% (6/8). Reported benefits included improved expert engagement, deeper evidence analysis, better collaboration, and shared authorship. Challenges included greater time demands, increased coordination, writing inconsistencies, and the need for full panel buy-in.
Conclusion:
The PSG method offers a promising structure to improve engagement and streamline productivity. While not without challenges, it may be particularly useful for large panels and complex guidelines when applied thoughtfully.
Related Concept Videos
Self-Help Support Groups
Accessibility and Cost-Effectiveness
One of the primary strengths of self-help...
Group Therapy
Sampling Plans
Random sampling is a method where each member of the population has an equal chance of being selected for the sample. It involves selecting individuals randomly, often using random number generators or lottery-type methods. For example, when analyzing the properties of a...
Group Polarization
Methods of Documentation III: PIE
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
