Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 16, 2026

Structured Approach to Colonoscopy Technique Optimization: A Single-Center Experience with Novice Endoscopists
Published on: July 11, 2025
Opportunistic Upper Endoscopy at the Time of Screening Colonoscopy: Feasibility, Acceptability, and Patient
Haejin In1,2, Katherine De la Torre-Cisneros1, Brijesh Rana1
1Division of Surgical Oncology, Rutgers Cancer Institute, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Background And Aims:
Gastric cancer is highly lethal due to late stage at discovery in the United States, yet no routine screening strategy exists. Opportunistic upper endoscopy (esophagogastroduodenoscopy [EGD]) performed during screening colonoscopy (concomitant EGD and routine colonoscopy [EGD-SC]) may provide a practical approach to early detection. We evaluated the feasibility, acceptability, patient perspectives, and diagnostic yield of EGD-SC.
Methods:
In this single-center, open-label, single-arm prospective pilot study, adults aged 45 to 80 years scheduled for colonoscopy without prior EGD in the past 5 years were enrolled. Feasibility was assessed by enrollment, additional procedural time, and safety. Acceptability, patient perspectives, beliefs, motivators, barriers, and satisfaction were assessed using preprocedure and postprocedure surveys. Gastric biopsies were evaluated for precancerous gastric lesions.
Results:
Of individuals contacted, 51.6% expressed interest and 26.6% enrolled (n = 50; median age 56; 48% male; 60% high risk). Median added time was 17 minutes (range, 9-26), with no complications. All respondents rated EGD-SC as satisfactory (n = 40, 100%) and 90% (n = 36) as acceptable; most preferred the combined procedure (n = 39, 97.5%) and would recommend it to family or friends (n = 37, 92.5%). Knowledge gaps were common: nearly half lacked awareness of gastric cancer risk factors; although 72% (n = 31) viewed screening as beneficial, only 23.3% (n = 10) perceived gastric cancer as severe, and none considered themselves highly susceptible. Diagnostic yield included Helicobacter pylori infection (n = 16, 32%), atrophic gastritis (n = 7, 14%), and intestinal metaplasia (n = 6, 12%), with higher prevalence among high-risk participants.
Conclusion:
EGD-SC is feasible, safe, and highly acceptable, with strong patient endorsement and meaningful detection of gastric cancer precursor lesions. Together, these results support risk-stratified EGD-SC as a promising and pragmatic strategy for gastric cancer prevention and early detection in the United States. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT05566899.
Related Concept Videos
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures I: Esophagogastroduodenoscopy
During an EGD, the endoscope can be used to:
Endoscopic Procedures III: Video Capsule Endoscopy
Endoscopic Procedures IV: Sigmoidoscopy and Laproscopy
Sigmoidoscopy
Sigmoidoscopy is a diagnostic procedure that uses a flexible sigmoidoscope equipped with a light source and camera to examine the rectum and sigmoid colon. The procedure involves inserting the tube through the anus...
Endoscopic Procedures V: ERCP
Patient...
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...