Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2026

Setting Limits on Supersymmetry Using Simplified Models
Published on: November 15, 2013
Simulation Study of the Decision Logic for 95% Upper Confidence Limit Calculations Applied in ProUCL 5.2
Leah D Stuchal1, Sara Hutton2, Casey Remmer2
1Center for Environmental and Human Toxicology, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
Abstract:
Risk assessors typically estimate long-term exposure by calculating a 95th percentile upper confidence level (95UCL) on the mean concentration across an exposure area. There are several methods for calculating a 95UCL. The United States Environmental Protection Agency has developed software (ProUCL) that calculates and recommends a 95UCL methodology based on the properties of the dataset. Release of ProUCL Version 5.2 in 2022 demonstrated a significant change in the decision tree used to recommend a 95UCL method. To evaluate the differences between ProUCL 5.1 and 5.2, a simulation study was performed that includes a range of samples sizes, coefficients of variation, and frequency of non-detects often seen in environmental datasets. Over 160,000 datasets were evaluated, and 95UCLs were calculated using both versions of the software. The results demonstrate a trade-off in coverage and accuracy between the two versions. ProUCL 5.2 recommends 95UCLs that exhibit greater accuracy but have lower coverage. ProUCL 5.1 recommends 95UCLs that achieve higher coverage, but accuracy is typically reduced by a factor of two. Future versions of ProUCL software could be improved through revisions to the decision tree that provide an appropriate balance between coverage and accuracy while also allowing advanced users to evaluate alternative performance criteria within applicable regulatory requirements.
Related Concept Videos
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Interpretation of Confidence Intervals
Confidence intervals have confidence coefficients that are crucial for their interpretation. The most common confidence coefficients are 0.90, 0.95, and 0.99, which can be written as percentages–90%, 95%, and 99%, respectively.
Suppose a person calculates a confidence interval with a confidence coefficient of 0.95. In that case, they can...
Testing a Claim about Population Proportion
There are two methods of testing a claim about a population proportion: (1) Using the sample proportion from the data where a binomial distribution is approximated to the normal distribution and (2) Using the binomial probabilities calculated from the data.
The first method uses normal distribution as an approximation to the binomial distribution. The requirements are as follows: sample size is large...
Evaluating Limits by Direct Substitution
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Uncertainty: Confidence Intervals
