Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 17, 2026

Utilizing Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation to Improve Language Function in Stroke Patients with Chronic Non-fluent Aphasia
Published on: July 2, 2013
Short-term swallowing outcomes associated with inductive electrical stimulation combined with tongue pressure
Fangfang Zhang1, Min Lu1, Qiong Yi1
1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, The Affiliated Huai'an No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, Jiangsu, China.
Objective:
To investigate the short-term swallowing outcomes associated with videofluoroscopy-guided inductive electrical stimulation combined with tongue pressure resistance feedback training in patients with post-stroke dysphagia.
Methods:
This non-randomized, single-center prospective study enrolled 238 patients with post-stroke dysphagia between January 2024 and December 2025. Patients were allocated according to preference to receive conventional swallowing rehabilitation or a a time-matched integrated program in which inductive electrical stimulation and tongue pressure resistance feedback training were incorporated within the same 30-minute rehabilitation session. The primary outcome was the change in Penetration-Aspiration Scale (PAS) score from baseline to post-treatment. Secondary outcomes included Functional Oral Intake Scale (FOIS), Swallowing Quality of Life questionnaire, Standardized Swallowing Assessment, videofluoroscopic kinematic parameters, surface electromyography parameters, maximum isometric tongue pressure, and post-treatment swallowing status improvement rate. Adjusted ANCOVA or logistic regression models were used to estimate treatment-associated differences.
Results:
Several baseline imbalances were observed, including stroke type, modified Rankin Scale score, baseline FOIS, baseline SWAL-QOL, and baseline tongue pressure. After adjustment for baseline values and clinically relevant covariates, the intervention group showed a greater reduction in PAS score than the control group, with an adjusted difference of -0.21 points; 95% CI, -0.37--0.05; P = 0.012. The intervention group also showed greater improvements in FOIS, SWAL-QOL, SSA, tongue pressure, thyroid cartilage and hyoid bone displacement, and swallowing time. The post-treatment swallowing status improvement rate was 89.9% in the intervention group and 73.1% in the control group, corresponding to an absolute rate difference of 16.8%, 95% CI, 7.2%-26.4%. In adjusted logistic regression, the intervention was associated with higher odds of clinical response, with an adjusted OR of 1.71, 95% CI, 1.15-2.59. Ordinal logistic sensitivity analyses for post-treatment PAS and FOIS yielded consistent findings. No serious adverse events were reported.
Conclusion:
Videofluoroscopy-guided inductive electrical stimulation combined with tongue pressure resistance feedback training was associated with greater short-term improvements in swallowing-related clinical, kinematic, and tongue pressure outcomes compared with conventional rehabilitation. Given the preference-based allocation and the multicomponent nature of the intervention, these findings should be interpreted as associative rather than definitive evidence of causal association.

