Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2026

Applying Advanced In Vitro Culturing Technology to Study the Human Gut Microbiota
Published on: February 15, 2019
Comparative analysis of four compound stomachs development, fermentation dynamics, and microbiome structure in Hu
Rui Zhang1,2, Chun E Niu1, Hai Na Shi3
1Key Laboratory of Animal Genetics and Breeding on the Tibetan Plateau, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, China.
Objective:
This study was conducted to investigate the differences in fermentation parameters, epithelial development, and microbial composition across the four stomach compartments between Hu sheep and its crossbreds.
Methods:
Forty-eight approximately 3-month-old male lambs, assigned to three genetic groups (HH:♂Hu×♀Hu, n=16; DH:♂Poll Dorset×♀Hu, n=16; SH:♂Southdown×♀Hu, n=16), were raised under uniform nutritional and management conditions for 95 days. Feed intake was determined daily and body weight were measured every 20 days. At the end of the trial, six sheep per group close to the average weight were slaughtered. Samples of digesta and tissue from the four stomachs were collected. Fermentation parameters, epithelial development, and microbial community structure were analyzed.
Results:
Compared with the HH group (acetate: 25.8, 21.8, and 6.36 mmol/kg; propionate: 6.8, 5.60, and 3.65 mmol/kg; butyrate: 3.66, 3.19, and 1.38 mmol/kg), the DH group exhibited significantly higher acetate concentrations (45.3, 33.7, and 12.9 mmol/kg), propionate (14.3, 11.1, and 5.94 mmol/kg), and butyrate (12.9, 6.69, and 4.52 mmol/kg) in the rumen, reticulum, and omasum, respectively (p<0.05), indicating enhanced fermentation capacity, a significantly thicker rumen mucosal epithelium (p<0.05) suggesting a greater capacity for VFA absorption. Taxonomic analysis showed that Firmicutes and Bacteroidota were the predominant phyla in four stomachs. Differential analysis identified that the DH group had significantly enriched taxa associated with fiber degradation (e.g., Fibrobacterota, Spirochaetota) in the forestomachs. Conversely, the rumen of HH group was enriched with Anaerolineae, associated with complex plant fiber degradation. PICRUSt2 functional prediction indicated that differentially microbes in the DH group were primarily linked to the biosynthesis of lysine and arginine, whereas those in the HH group were enriched in degradation pathways such as amino acid degradation.
Conclusion:
The DH group markedly elevated VFA production by modulating the forestomach microbial structure. Combined with adaptive improvements in rumen epithelial, this effect potentially enhanced energy utilization and growth performance.
Related Concept Videos
Overview of Human Digestion
Microbiota of the Stomach and Small Intestine
Microbes in Food Production

