Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 19, 2026
Novel Diagnostics in Revision Arthroplasty: Implant Sonication and Multiplex Polymerase Chain Reaction
Published on: December 3, 2017
Comparative Analysis of Preadmission Testing Center and Primary Care Physician Clearance Before Total Joint
Jake Laverdiere1,2, Swaroopa Vaidya1, Gregory Panza3
1Connecticut Orthopaedic Institute, St. Vincent's Medical Center, Hartford Healthcare, Bridgeport, CT, USA.
Background:
Effective preoperative evaluation is crucial for mitigating complications and cancellations in total joint arthroplasty. Limited access to a primary care physician (PCP) and fragmented coordination can delay clearance and increase perioperative risk. To address these challenges, preadmission testing centers (PATCs) have been implemented to streamline workflows. This study compares outcomes and cancellation rates between PATC and PCP-led pathways.
Methods:
Retrospective study of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty between June 2022 and November 2024 at 2 community hospitals comparing demographics, outcomes, and cancellation rates between PATC vs PCP. Statistical analyses included sample t-tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, chi-square, or Fisher's exact tests. Clinical outcomes including length of stay, discharge disposition, complications, and cancellations were adjusted for age, body mass index, and Charlson Comorbidity Index.
Results:
Among 8784 patients, 5641 (64.2%) were evaluated at PATC and 3143 (35.8%) by PCP. Patients evaluated at PATC were younger (68.98 ± 9.35 vs 70.38 ± 9.01 years, P < .001) and had a higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (median 1.0 [2.0] vs 1.0 [1.0], P < .001). Overall cancellation rates (P = .637) and 90-day postoperative complications (P = .212) were similar between groups. However, the PATC group demonstrated a slightly longer length of stay (median 27.9 [5.3] vs 27.5 [5.0] hours, P = .001), higher discharge to skilled nursing facilities (4.0% vs 2.3%, P < .05 after Bonferroni adjustment), and greater postoperative emergency department utilization (6.6% vs 4.0%, P < .001).
Conclusions:
Despite managing a higher-risk population, PATC evaluation demonstrated comparable cancellation and complication rates to PCP clearance, supporting centralized, protocol-driven preoperative evaluation as a viable alternative in real-world settings where access to primary care may be limited.
