Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Evaluating the Effectiveness of Cancer Drug Sensitization In Vitro and In Vivo
Published on: February 6, 2015
Organic sonosensitizers for cancer therapy: molecular engineering from band-gap control to clinical application
Talha Baig1, Mubashar Ilyas1, Muhammad Abbas2
1Key Laboratory of Cluster Science, Ministry of Education of China, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Beijing Institute of Technology, Beijing, 102488, P. R. China. yinxd18@bit.edu.cn.
Abstract:
Sonodynamic therapy (SDT) has emerged as a promising non-invasive cancer treatment. By employing low-intensity focused ultrasound, SDT activates sonosensitizers to produce cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS), enabling selective tumor cell death at tissue depths exceeding 10 cm. Due to their excellent safety profiles, structural tunability, biodegradability, and ease of rational synthetic modification, organic small molecules have increasingly surpassed their inorganic counterparts as the preferred class of sonosensitizers. This review provides a comprehensive, family-by-family analysis of organic sonosensitizers, encompassing porphyrins, phthalocyanines, BODIPY derivatives, xanthenes, cyanines, aggregation-induced emission luminogens (AIEgens), boron-doped acene compounds, and natural product-derived sensitizers. We methodically examine the molecular underpinnings of SDT, including ultrasonic cavitation, sonoluminescence, pyrolysis, and band gap-mediated ROS generation via Type I and Type II pathways. Furthermore, we critically evaluate the key structure-activity relationships (SARs) governing sonosensitizing performance across these compound families, specifically highlighting HOMO-LUMO gap engineering, intersystem crossing (ISC) efficiency, heavy atom effects, donor-acceptor designs, and aggregation behaviors. Beyond molecular design, this review assesses nanotechnological delivery strategies engineered to overcome tumor hypoxia, enable stimuli-responsive activation, and achieve precise immunological reprogramming of the tumor microenvironment. Finally, we evaluate available clinical data on porphyrin- and chlorin-based sensitizers alongside their inherent structural limitations. Ultimately, this review seeks to bridge the gap between academic innovation and clinical translation, offering a foundational reference for the next generation of acoustically activated cancer therapeutics.
More Related Videos
09:45Photodynamic Therapy with Blended Conducting Polymer/Fullerene Nanoparticle Photosensitizers
Published on: October 28, 2015
09:05Generation and Quantitative Analysis of Pulsed Low Frequency Ultrasound to Determine the Sonic Sensitivity of Untreated and Treated Neoplastic Cells
Published on: July 22, 2015
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Combination Therapies and Personalized Medicine
The combination of the drug acetazolamide and sulforaphane is a good example of combination therapy to treat cancer. The cells in the interior of a large tumor often die due to the hypoxic and...