Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Assessment of Dependence in Activities of Daily Living Among Older Patients in an Acute Care Unit
Published on: September 30, 2020
Institutional Post-Acute Care Use After Hospitalization by Medicare Type, 2017-2022
Jiwon Park1, Emine Poyraz1, Joshua Startup1
1Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Objectives:
To compare national discharge to inpatient rehabilitation facilities (IRF) and skilled nursing facilities (SNF) after short-stay hospitalization among Medicare Advantage (MA) and Traditional Medicare (TM) beneficiaries.
Design:
Retrospective cohort study using publicly available aggregate Medicare utilization data.
Setting And Participants:
Participants included United States MA and TM beneficiaries from 2017 to 2022.
Methods:
Primary outcomes were discharge rates to IRFs and SNFs per 1000 acute hospital discharges and in-facility mortality. Secondary outcomes included community discharge and 30-day readmission among TM beneficiaries. Year-adjusted Poisson regression with acute discharges as an offset estimated incidence rate ratios (IRRs) comparing MA and TM utilization. Discharge-weighted logistic regression estimated odds ratios (ORs) for mortality, community discharge, and readmission. Trends in IRF vs SNF utilization were evaluated using year-adjusted logistic regression.
Results:
Compared with TM beneficiaries, MA beneficiaries had lower discharge rates to IRF (IRR, 0.397; 95% CI, 0.395-0.398), with a smaller difference for SNF (IRR, 0.904; 95% CI, 0.903-0.905). Within IRF, in-facility mortality odds were higher for MA beneficiaries (OR, 14.69; 95% CI, 14.21-15.18). Within SNF, in-facility mortality odds were lower for MA beneficiaries (OR, 0.447; 95% CI, 0.444-0.450). Across both payers combined, mortality was lower in IRF than SNF (0.71% vs 2.46%; OR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.278-0.286; P < .001). Among TM beneficiaries, discharge to IRF was associated with lower odds of 30-day readmission (OR, 0.76; 95% CI, 0.75-0.76) and higher odds of community discharge (OR, 1.84; 95% CI, 1.83-1.85).
Conclusions And Implications:
MA beneficiaries had lower downstream use of IRF after hospitalization than TM beneficiaries. In-facility mortality differed among post-acute settings and payer. Patient-level case-mix at the referral source is needed to evaluate whether these differences persist after case mix adjustment.
Related Concept Videos
Hospitals-I
Restorative Care
Documentation in Long-Term and Home Healthcare Setting
Long-Term Care Facilities
Tertiary Healthcare System
Hospitals-II
Nurses that work in hospitals have...
Specialized Care Centers and Settings-I
Daycare centers
They provide several functions. Some facilities care for healthy newborns and children whose parents work, while others are medically focused and care for...