Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 20, 2026

Aqueous Synthesis of Plasmonic Gold-Tin Alloy Nanoparticles
Published on: March 15, 2024
Prioritizing barriers and strategies for non-toxic material adoption in interior design
Vigneshkumar Chellappa1, Shalini Sharma2, Martina Zelenakova3,4
1School of Design, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR, China.
Background:
Growing concern about indoor environmental quality and occupant health has underscored the need to select interior materials that minimize harmful chemical emissions and reduce exposure to toxic substances. However, despite growing awareness of healthier interior environments, the adoption of non-toxic materials remains limited due to technical, informational, economic, and organizational challenges.
Methods:
This study adopted a three-stage multi-method approach. First, a Comprehensive Literature Review (CLR) was conducted to identify 19 barriers and 15 strategies related to the adoption of non-toxic materials in interior design. Second, a two-round Delphi technique was used to validate and refine these factors, involving 22 expert panelists in Round 1 and 16 in Round 2. Third, the Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS), a multi-attribute decision-making method, was used to prioritize the identified barriers and strategies based on expert qualification-weighted scores.
Results:
The TOPSIS analysis identified the five most critical barriers as lack of awareness (Rank 1), limited client interest (Rank 2), cultural resistance (Rank 3), lack of collaboration (Rank 4), and limited data availability (Rank 5). The five highest-priority strategies were educational campaigns (Rank 1), client education initiatives (Rank 2), fostering a collaborative design culture (Rank 3), interdisciplinary collaboration (Rank 4), and developing comprehensive resource databases (Rank 5). These findings indicate that the adoption of non-toxic materials is mainly constrained by informational, cultural, and demand-side barriers, while educational and collaborative interventions offer the most effective responses.
Conclusion:
The study provides a structured, evidence-based framework for understanding and prioritizing barriers and strategies for adopting non-toxic materials in interior design. The findings offer practical guidance for designers, policymakers, and industry stakeholders seeking to promote healthier interior environments through informed material selection and coordinated action.
Related Concept Videos
Design Example: Sustainability in Concrete Building
There are multiple approaches to achieve sustainability in a commercial concrete building. For instance, construct a concrete parking area under the building, utilizing pervious concrete paver blocks in open areas to facilitate rainwater collection through an underground cistern.
Pharmaceutical Poisoning: Treatment Strategies
Microbial Corrosion
Types of Toxins
Air pollutants, primarily gases, pose significant threats to respiratory health, leading to conditions like hypoxia, lung cancer, and in extreme cases, death.
Environmental pollutants like...
Waterproofing and Anti-Bacterial Admixtures in Concrete
Waterproofing admixtures render concrete hydrophobic,...
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
