Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2026

Evaluation of Colorectal Cancer Risk and Prevalence by Stool DNA Integrity Detection
Published on: June 8, 2020
Non-Invasive Colorectal Cancer Screening Using Stool- and Blood-Based Tests: Evidence, Feasibility, and Equity
Haocheng Wang1, Ruilan Chen2, Yao Ying3
1Colorectal Cancer Center, Department of General Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan.
Abstract:
Colorectal cancer (CRC) remains a major cause of cancer incidence and mortality worldwide. Because colonoscopy is resource-intensive and participation is incomplete, non-invasive screening tests are central to population-level prevention. This review synthesizes recent evidence on fecal immunochemical testing (FIT), multi-omics stool DNA-FIT (mt-sDNA-FIT), multi-omics stool RNA-FIT (mt-sRNA-FIT), and blood-based assays, with emphasis on screening of asymptomatic individuals at average risk, the distinction between cancer detection and advanced precancerous lesion detection, and the operational requirements needed to translate test performance into public health benefit. FIT remains the most scalable first-line option in many programs because it is inexpensive, repeatable, and supported by evidence from organized screening. Its performance depends on hemoglobin threshold, sampling and handling, lesion biology, repeated adherence, and colonoscopy completion after a positive result. Molecular stool assays generally improve single-application sensitivity for CRC and advanced precancerous lesions but reduce specificity and increase costs and demand for colonoscopy. Blood-based assays may improve acceptability among people who decline stool testing or colonoscopy; however, current evidence indicates reduced detection of advanced precancerous lesions, limiting their preventive value when used as direct replacements for stool-based strategies. Implementation barriers occur across the screening pathway, including invitation, test access, sample return, laboratory processing, result communication, diagnostic colonoscopy, pathology, treatment access, and registry tracking. Future progress should prioritize risk-adapted screening, validated molecular and multiomics biomarkers, and artificial intelligence-assisted triage, and equitable program design. The most defensible strategy is not universal adoption of a single assay but a resource-stratified pathway that matches screening modality to population risk, patient acceptability, and system capacity.
Related Concept Videos
Serum Laboratory Studies, Stool Test, Breath Test
Imaging Studies III: Gastrointestinal Motility Studies and Virtual Colonoscopy
Radionuclide Testing
Radionuclide testing is a sophisticated medical technique for assessing gastrointestinal motility. It focuses on gastric emptying and colonic transit time. Radioactive markers track the movement of food through the digestive system, providing insights into gastrointestinal disorders.
In gastric emptying studies, a meal's liquid and solid...
Assessment of the Rectum and Anus
Rectal Inspection
Begin by inspecting the perianal and anal areas for color, texture, rashes,...
Endoscopic Procedures II: Colonoscopy
Inflammatory Bowel Disease III: Diagnostic Studies and Management I-Nutritional Therapy
Diagnostic studies
A colonoscopy is the definitive screening test, distinguishing ulcerative colitis from other colon diseases with similar symptoms. During a colonoscopy test, inflamed mucosa with exudate ulcerations can be observed, and biopsies are taken to determine the histologic characteristics of the colonic...
