Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2026

Quantification of Mouse Heart Left Ventricular Function, Myocardial Strain, and Hemodynamic Forces by Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: May 24, 2021
Myocardial Tissue Characterization by CMR Captures Mechanistic Severity Beyond Filling Pressure in HFpEF: The
Eike Nagel1, Philip Wenzel2, Tim Seidler3
1Institute for Experimental and Translational Cardiovascular Imaging, Internal Medicine, Cardiology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany; German Center for Cardiovascular Research, DZHK, Partner Site Rhine-Main, Germany.
Background:
Diastolic dysfunction (DD) in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) reflects active relaxation (τ) and passive stiffness (β), conflated by end-diastolic pressure (EDP) and potentially requiring different therapies. Whether cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) tissue mapping captures these beyond filling pressure is unknown.
Objectives:
This study aims to determine whether CMR tissue mapping (native T1 corrected for field strength and scanner [T1c], native T2 corrected for field strength and scanner [T2c]) captures τ and β as markers of mechanistic severity in HFpEF beyond EDP.
Methods:
In this prospective multicenter study, patients with suspected HFpEF underwent CMR with sequence-corrected tissue mapping and invasive pressure-volume loop analysis. HFpEF was defined as EDP ≥16 mm Hg (n = 52). Age- and sex-matched control patients (n = 32) and healthy volunteers (n = 18) provided cross-group context. Eighteen catheterized symptomatic patients with normal resting EDP underwent handgrip provocation for a continuum analysis. Partial correlations adjusted T1c-β and T2c-τ associations for EDP.
Results:
T1c and T2c differed between HFpEF and matched control patients (Cliff's δ 0.74 and 0.80; both P < 0.001). Within HFpEF, T1c correlated with β (partial ρ = 0.47; P = 0.003) and T2c with τ (ρ = 0.35; P = 0.018), both conditional on EDP. Exploratory partitioning around medoids clustering on τ and β identified 2 phenotypes (mild DD [n = 24], severe DD [n = 28]; adjusted Rand index: 0.78) that separated T1c and T2c (both P < 0.001), whereas an EDP median split did not, consistent with tissue mapping reflecting mechanistic severity beyond filling pressure.
Conclusions:
In invasively characterized HFpEF, CMR tissue mapping captures active relaxation impairment and passive stiffness conditional on filling pressure, robust to clinical covariate adjustment. The exploratory 2-phenotype partition is hypothesis-generating; prospective external validation, including treatment-response data, is required before clinical stratification. (Validation of CMR Against Invasive Heamodynamics in Patients With HFpEF [DECIPHER HFpEF]; NCT03251183).
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy
Cardiomyopathy IV: Restrictive Cardiomyopathy
Mitral Stenosis II: Clinical features and Diagnostic Tests
Acute Coronary Syndrome III: Diagnostic Studies
