Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 21, 2026

An Anaerobic Biosensor Assay for the Detection of Mercury and Cadmium
Published on: December 17, 2018
Global cereal trade drives bidirectional cadmium redistribution across income groups
Nan Xiao1, Yue Wang2, Hongping Chen3
1College of Environmental and Resource Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; State Key Laboratory of Soil Pollution Control and Safety, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China; Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Water Pollution Control and Water Ecological Health, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou 310058, China.
Abstract:
Cadmium governance assumes that controlling contamination where cereals are grown is sufficient to protect consumers, yet how international trade redistributes this exposure remains unquantified. Here we reconstruct four-decade (1980-2023) national cadmium concentration time series for rice, wheat and corn from 182,873 grain measurements across 55 countries using crop-specific random forest models, and couple them with bilateral trade flows to quantify trade-embedded cadmium-the fraction of dietary exposure originating from imports rather than domestic production. Three transmission pathways operate in opposing directions: wheat exports carry cadmium consistent with long-term phosphate fertilizer accumulation from high-income producers to low-income importers; rice channels cadmium associated with mining-affected production regions from low-income exporters into high-income diets; and corn from major exporters consistently carries lower concentrations than recipients' domestic production, diluting rather than amplifying exposure. By 2023, trade-embedded cadmium accounted for 86% of wheat-related exposure in low-income countries and 62% of rice-related exposure in high-income countries, up from 73% and 11% in 1986. Screening-level assessment under a 60-kg adult reference scenario identifies rice in Bangladesh as exceeding the JECFA health-based guidance value, with additional exceedances under the more conservative EFSA benchmark. These crop-specific flows are not captured by production-focused governance, indicating a need for complementary supply-chain accounting and source-resolved import monitoring.