Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2026

A Machine Learning Approach to Design an Efficient Selective Screening of Mild Cognitive Impairment
Published on: January 11, 2020
Applicability of Non-Invasive Eligibility Criteria for MASH Pharmacotherapy: A Multicentre Cohort Study
Nicola Pugliese1,2, Davide Polverini2, Arianna Bertazzoni1,2
1Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Pieve Emanuele, Italy.
Background And Aims:
Non-invasive tests (NITs) are increasingly used to guide patient selection for pharmacological treatment of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH). We aimed to quantify and compare real-world treatment eligibility according to the AASLD and expert panel-derived criteria and to evaluate classification of patients with available liver histology.
Methods:
We retrospectively included 897 adults with MASLD from four Italian referral centres. Eligibility was assessed using AASLD criteria, defined by liver stiffness measurement (LSM) 8-15 kPa without cirrhosis, and expert panel-derived criteria, defined by LSM 10-19.9 kPa, platelet count ≥ 140 × 109/L, and no cirrhosis. A subgroup of 175 patients underwent liver biopsy within ±3 months of first referral.
Results:
Median age was 62 years, 57.1% were men, 48.4% had obesity, and 36.0% had Type 2 diabetes. Overall, 202 patients (22.5%) met AASLD criteria and 114 (12.7%) met expert panel-derived criteria. Eighty-six patients were eligible according to both criteria, whereas 144 were classified differently. Type 2 diabetes and obesity were independently associated with eligibility under both criteria. In the biopsy subgroup, 73 patients had histological F2-F3 fibrosis; 35 (47.9%) did not meet AASLD criteria and 49 (67.1%) did not meet expert panel-derived criteria.
Conclusions:
The AASLD and expert panel-derived criteria identified different real-world populations potentially suitable for MASH pharmacotherapy. In the biopsy subgroup, NIT-based eligibility classification only partly aligned with histological F2-F3 fibrosis.
Related Concept Videos
Bioavailability Study Design: Healthy Subjects Versus Patients
Bioequivalence of Drugs: Drugs with Multiple Indications
Pharmacogenomics: Identification of New Drug Targets
Impact of Pharmacokinetic–Pharmacodynamic Models: Regulatory Decisions
