Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2026

Standardized Model of Ventricular Fibrillation and Advanced Cardiac Life Support in Swine
Published on: January 30, 2020
Phenotypes of cardiogenic shock after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: the SCAI-V classification
Roman Roy1,2, Muhamad Abd Razak1,2, Shamika Mohanan3
1Department of Cardiology, King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
Background:
Classifying cardiogenic shock (CS) after out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) is challenging, with end-organ hypoperfusion arising from mechanisms distinct to non-arrested CS.
Aims:
We sought to evaluate the performance of current CS classifications and to develop the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions (SCAI)-V classification of CS after resuscitated OHCA.
Methods:
We performed a retrospective analysis of an international derivation cohort (London, United Kingdom; GdaÅsk, Poland; n=627) and external validation of the 2x2 SCAI-V construct in the TTM-2 trial cohort (n=1,781). The primary outcome was mortality; the secondary outcome was non-neurological mortality at hospital discharge (derivation cohort) or at 180 days (TTM-2 cohort).
Results:
In the derivation cohort, the median age was 63 years (interquartile range 53-74), and 76% were male. Applying the 2022 SCAI classification (SCAI-2022), 60% of patients had discordant haemodynamic parameters and lactate levels. We developed the SCAI-V classification, grouping patients according to their SCAI grade (shock absent or present) and lactate level (<5 mmol/L or ≥5 mmol/L) into four phenotypes - non-shock, systemic ischaemia, haemodynamic shock, and haemometabolic shock - using a 2x2 factorial framework. The SCAI-V classification was associated with all-cause and non-neurological mortality (p<0.001). Survival was highest in the non-shock group (78% and 68%, in the derivation and validation cohorts, respectively), followed by haemodynamic shock (60% and 51%), then systemic ischaemia (50% and 42%), and lowest in the haemometabolic group (20% and 27%). In the derivation cohort, the SCAI-V classification displayed superior model fit, discrimination, and calibration than the 2019 and 2022 SCAI classifications. In the TTM-2 cohort, external evaluation using SCAI-V showed consistent model fit advantages and discrimination comparable to SCAI-2022.
Conclusions:
The SCAI-V classification enhances phenotypic profiling of CS after resuscitated OHCA and may improve patient selection for early invasive therapies in this population.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Pathophysiology of Heart Failure
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation III: AED Use
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation IV: Pharmacological Management
Heart Failure IV: Classification and Diagnostic Evaluation
Cardiomyopathy I: Introduction and Classification
Cardiomyopathy III: Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy

