Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2026
Four-Dimensional Computed Tomography-Guided Valve Sizing for Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Replacement
Published on: January 20, 2022
Newer-generation balloon-expandable vs. self-expanding transcatheter aortic valves: a propensity score matched
Massimo Baudo1,2, Serge Sicouri1, Dimitrios E Magouliotis1
1Department of Cardiac Surgery Research, Lankenau Institute for Medical Research, Main Line Health, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania, USA.
Aims:
Balloon-expandable valve (BEV) and self-expanding valve (SEV) platforms have undergone significant technological advancements. This study aimed to compare postoperative outcomes in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) treated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) using newer-generation BEV and SEV devices.
Methods:
We retrospectively analyzed all patients who underwent TAVI for severe native AS at a single center between January 2018 and December 2023. Exclusion criteria included emergency procedures, active endocarditis, prior aortic valve interventions, bicuspid valves, primary aortic regurgitation, non-transfemoral access, concomitant coronary procedures, and use of retracted valves. Bioprosthetic valve dysfunction (BVD) was assessed according to modified Valve Academic Research Consortium 3 (VARC-3) definitions.
Results:
Propensity score matching was used to create 354 well balanced pairs. Periprocedural outcomes, including mortality, were comparable between the matched BEV and SEV groups. However, echocardiographic evaluation at discharge revealed significantly higher mean transvalvular gradients (P < 0.001) and peak velocities (P < 0.001) in the BEV group. During follow-up, the SEV group showed a significantly lower incidence of BVD [hazard ratio (HR): 0.64, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.45-0.91; P = 0.013], particularly regarding higher rates of severe prosthesis-patient mismatch (P = 0.001) and at least moderate structural valve deterioration (P = 0.006). No significant differences were observed in all-cause (HR: 1.18, 95% CI: 0.90-1.56, P = 0.235), or cardiac-related mortality (HR: 1.29, 95% CI: 0.91-1.83, P = 0.157).
Conclusion:
Among patients treated with newer-generation transcatheter valves, SEV demonstrated more favorable hemodynamic performance compared with BEV. However, short- and mid-term mortality rates remained similar between the two groups. Longer-term follow-up of randomized trials is needed to confirm these findings.
