Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 22, 2026

Evaluating In Vitro DNA Damage Using Comet Assay
Published on: October 11, 2017
Safety and Efficacy of Ceralasertib plus Olaparib for Advanced/Metastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer in Three
Andrew Tutt1, Zbigniew Nowecki2, Renata Szoszkiewicz3
1Institute of Cancer Research London United Kingdom.
Purpose:
VIOLETTE (NCT03330847) assessed olaparib alone or with ceralasertib (ATR inhibitor) or adavosertib (WEE1 inhibitor) as second-/third-line treatment in three molecular strata of patients with previously treated, PARP inhibitor-naïve, advanced triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).
Patients And Methods:
Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to olaparib 300 mg twice daily (BD), ceralasertib 160 mg once daily (Days 1-7; 28-day cycles) + olaparib 300 mg BD, or adavosertib 150 mg BD (Days 1-3, 8-10; 21-day cycles) + olaparib 200 mg BD. Patients were stratified by presence of tumoral homologous recombination repair (HRR) pathway mutations (m): BRCA1/2m, non-BRCA1/2m HRRm, or non-HRRm. Primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) by blinded independent central review.
Results:
273 patients were randomized: 114, 112, and 47 to the olaparib, ceralasertib + olaparib, and adavosertib + olaparib arms, respectively. The adavosertib + olaparib arm was terminated early due to unacceptable toxicity. Median PFS of ceralasertib + olaparib was 7.4, 3.9, and 3.6 months in the BRCA1/2m, non-BRCA1/2m HRRm, and non-HRRm strata, respectively, and did not differ significantly from olaparib (HR 1.02 [90% CI, 0.63-1.66], 0.54 [90% CI, 0.28-1.03], and 0.76 [90% CI, 0.50-1.14], respectively). In the non-HRRm group objective response rates (ORR) were significantly improved for ceralasertib + olaparib (15.4%) vs. olaparib (3.9%; OR, 4.45; 90% CI, 1.30‒21.20; P = 0.0425). No unexpected safety signals were reported for ceralasertib or olaparib.
Conclusions:
In patients with advanced PARP inhibitor-naïve non-HRRm TNBC, ceralasertib + olaparib significantly improved ORR versus olaparib. However, clinical significance is limited without improvement in PFS.
More Related Videos
10:27Testing Targeted Therapies in Cancer using Structural DNA Alteration Analysis and Patient-Derived Xenografts
Published on: July 25, 2020
03:07Single-Port Robotic-assisted Transaxillary Breast-conserving Surgery: A Prospective, Single-arm, Non-randomized Phase IIa Clinical Trial
Published on: August 19, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer-Critical Genes II: Tumor Suppressor Genes
When the function of certain critical genes, especially those involved in cell cycle regulation and cell growth signaling cascades, gets disrupted, it upsets the cell cycle progression. Such cells with unchecked cell cycles start proliferating uncontrollably and eventually develop into tumors.
Such genes that act...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Treatment Resistent Cancers