Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

In Silico Modeling Method for Computational Aquatic Toxicology of Endocrine Disruptors: A Software-Based Approach Using QSAR Toolbox
Published on: August 28, 2019
A practical decision-making approach for tiered in silico chemical hazard assessment based on the safe and
Karolina Jagiello1, Szymon Zdybel1, Anita Sosnowska1
1QSAR Lab, Grunwaldzka Ave. 103A 80-244 Gdańsk, Poland; Laboratory of Environmental Chemometrics, Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Wita Stwosza 63 80-308 Gdansk, Poland.
Abstract:
The "Safe and Sustainable by Design" (SSbD) approach promotes the development of chemicals that are inherently safer and more sustainable, including viable alternatives to hazardous substances. It involves assessing the toxicity, environmental impact and functionality of potential substitutes to ensure that they meet performance requirements without compromising safety. In silico methods using computational tools and simulations support the SSbD approach by predicting the toxicity, environmental persistence and performance of potential substitutes prior to upscaling in physical testing. This approach intends to accelerate the design process, reduce costs on the long run and improve safety and sustainability through the early identification of and optimisation towards safer and more sustainable chemicals and materials. Surfactants (SFs) and flame retardants (FRs) are among the many areas of interest to regulators and scientists across various industries. Due to the massive growth of global markets resulting from a wide range of their applications, and evidence of the adverse impact on the environment and human health, there is a pressing need to accelerate the design and implementation of safer alternatives for those chemicals. In this paper, we present an intuitive and harmonised workflow on how the use of quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) -based in silico tools for preliminary hazard assessment and data gap filling, in accordance with the SSbD multi-tiered approach. We illustrate the practical application of these guidelines through three case studies that reflect realistic scenarios encountered by SSbD practitioners during chemical safety assessment. A harmonised, step-by-step decision-making process, supported by flowcharts included in our decision-making framework for Tier 0 and 1 Hazard Identification in regard of the Joint Research Centre (JRC)'s updated SSbD framework, enables users to assess the hazards associated with a given chemical substance in accordance with the most important and up-to-date regulations in force within the European Union (EU).
Related Concept Videos
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Design Example: Analyzing Capacity Contours for Flood Risk Assessment
Structure-Activity Relationships and Drug Design
SAR studies the intricate relationship between a drug's chemical structure and biological activity. It focuses on understanding how modifications to a drug's structure can influence its...
Dimensional Analysis
In fluid mechanics, dimensional...
