Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

An Ivor Lewis Esophagectomy Designed to Minimize Anastomotic Complications and Optimize Conduit Function
Published on: April 17, 2020
Novel endoscopic treatment to prevent refractory caustic esophageal strictures: a propensity score-matched analysis
Thitiporn Chobarporn1, Dudsadee Mesiri2, Papawee Chennavasin2
1Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand.
Background:
Refractory caustic esophageal stricture (RCES) is a highly morbid condition. Prevention, rather than treatment, remains the ultimate goal. During the acute phase of injury, we have observed abundant fibrinous adhesions on the luminal surface of the injured esophagus, leading to luminal obliteration. We hypothesize that maintaining luminal patency during this period using our novel technique-Repeated Endoscopy with Intraluminal Fibrinous adhesioLysis of the Esophagus (RIFLE)-is crucial for successful subsequent esophageal dilation and for reducing the prevalence of RCES.
Methods:
Patients with Zargar grade IIb to IIIa caustic acid esophageal injuries were included in the study. Those who underwent the RIFLE program were assigned to the study group. Upper endoscopy with gentle lysis of intraluminal fibrinous adhesions was performed by advancing the endoscopic tip along with normal saline irrigation through the lesions, initially on the second or third day post-ingestion, and then repeated twice weekly during the first two weeks after the injury. Patients who received conventional treatment comprised the control group. Individuals in both groups who developed esophageal strictures underwent a dilation program. One-to-one propensity score matching was conducted.
Results:
Fifty patients (25 in the RIFLE group and 25 in the conventional group) met the inclusion criteria. The median number of RIFLE sessions was four, and no endoscopic treatment-related complications occurred in patients undergoing RIFLE. At a median follow-up of 9 months, the rates of esophageal stricture, RCES, and esophageal reconstruction were significantly lower in the RIFLE group compared to the conventional group: 6/25 (24%) vs. 24/25 (96%), p < 0.001; 2/25 (8%) vs. 19/25 (76%), p < 0.001; and 2/25 (8%) vs. 17/25 (68%), p < 0.001, respectively.
Conclusions:
Patients with severe caustic acid esophageal injury without transmural necrosis who underwent the RIFLE procedure experienced a reduced prevalence of RCES and subsequent esophageal reconstruction.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Barrett Esophagus-I: Introduction
This constant acid exposure transforms the esophagus's pink mucosal lining (stratified squamous epithelium) into a type of lining more similar...
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:

