Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
Published on: June 7, 2018
Thermal pseudotransitions in a frustrated spin-pseudospin sawtooth chain
1Federal University of Lavras, Department of Physics, Institute of Natural Science, Lavras, MG, Brazil.
Abstract:
We present an exact analysis of a spin-pseudospin sawtooth chain that incorporates three distinct valence states of copper ions and serves as a minimal model for one-dimensional cuprates composed of corner-sharing copper triangles. The model includes magnetic exchange and electrostatic coupling constants both along the base sites and between base and apex sites capturing the competition between spin and charge degrees of freedom. Using the transfer-matrix method, we derive exact expressions for the free energy and obtain an analytical condition defining the pseudocritical line associated with pronounced thermodynamic anomalies. The ground-state analysis reveals, besides an antiferromagnetic phase, three frustrated phases characterized by distinct residual entropies. At finite temperatures, these zero-temperature phase boundaries evolve into narrow entropy ridges signaling pseudotransitions between the corresponding quasiphases. The specific heat and the avoided-crossing scale exhibit sharp but continuous peaks at the pseudocritical temperature, whereas the physical correlation length may be controlled by a different subleading eigenvalue. Local correlation functions uncover a cooperative rearrangement from charge-dominated to magnetically correlated regimes. Our results demonstrate that the sawtooth geometry promotes frustration and short-range coherence leading to pronounced pseudotransition behavior.
Related Concept Videos
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must have a...
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Spin State Population Distribution
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Atomic Nuclei: Nuclear Relaxation Processes

