Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

Endoscopic Injection Sclerotherapy Assisted by Cyanoacrylate and Clips for Gastroesophageal Varices
Published on: June 13, 2025
Exceptionally prolonged retention of a silicone-covered esophageal stent before TIPS for refractory variceal
Xiulan Peng1, YuanYuan Wang2, Juping Han2
1Department of Oncology, Geriatric Hospital Affiliated to Wuhan University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China.
Background And Aims:
Refractory esophageal variceal bleeding (REVB) in patients with cirrhosis is associated with high mortality. Self-expanding metal stents (SEMS) serve as a salvage therapeutic option. However, data regarding their prolonged use as a bridge to transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) remain limited. We report a case in which REVB was managed with prolonged SEMS placement before TIPS.
Case Presentation:
A 72-year-old female with decompensated cirrhosis presented with acute hematemesis. After failure of endoscopic injection sclerotherapy and band ligation to control active bleeding from a ruptured esophageal varix, a fully covered SEMS was successfully deployed. The patient declined the scheduled stent removal and was subsequently followed conservatively. TIPS was performed 387 days after stent placement, followed by a successful stent retrieval. Clinical outcomes, including rebleeding episodes and procedure-related complications, were recorded throughout follow-up until July 26, 2026.
Results:
Immediate hemostasis was achieved following SEMS deployment. During the 387-day indwelling period, the patient developed intermittent acid regurgitation, retrosternal discomfort, and endoscopic evidence of mucosal ulceration and granulation tissue at the stent site. The stent was successfully removed after TIPS, and follow-up endoscopy revealed complete resolution of the esophageal varices. The patient remained free of recurrent bleeding till the last follow-up. However, two episodes of hepatic encephalopathy occurred after TIPS.
Conclusion:
This case suggests that successful removal of a fully covered esophageal SEMS may remain technically feasible even after an exceptionally prolonged retention period. Nonetheless, this observation should not be interpreted as support for routine prolonged stent placement, which lies outside current guideline recommendations and may entail substantial risks.
Related Concept Videos
Esophageal Varices-II: Clinical Features and Management
In the initial assessment, a thorough review of the patient's medical history is vital to identify risk factors such as liver disease, alcohol abuse, or...
Esophageal Varices-I: Introduction
Esophageal Perforation-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
Clinical Manifestations:
Esophageal Strictures-II: Clinical Features and Management
Healthcare providers should gather a comprehensive medical history and conduct a physical examination for diagnosis. If esophageal stricture is...
Barrett Esophagus-II: Clinical Manifestations and Management
To diagnose Barrett's esophagus, healthcare providers often recommend an endoscopy for those showing symptoms of acid reflux. The procedure entails...
Esophageal Strictures-I: Introduction
Etiology
The primary cause of esophageal strictures is long-standing gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), accounting for about 70 to 80% of adult cases. Chronic acid reflux can lead to injury and scarring of the esophageal lining, culminating in...
