Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

Vessel-Sparing Microsurgical Longitudinal Intussusception Vasoepididymostomy to Treat Epididymal Obstructive Azoospermia
Published on: May 27, 2022
A homozygous SPDYA variant associated with meiotic arrest and failed microdissection testicular sperm extraction in
Huimei Zheng1, Yunbo Wang2,3, Jia Wang2,3
1Zhejiang Key Laboratory of Precision Diagnosis and Therapy for Major Gynecological Diseases, the Women's Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Background:
Non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) with meiotic maturation arrest is a severe form of male infertility for which genetic diagnosis may inform counseling and sperm-retrieval expectations.
Methods:
Whole-exome sequencing was performed in a consanguineous family with NOA, followed by SPDYA variant screening in 31 unrelated NOA patients and 469 men with documented reproductive outcomes. The proband underwent clinical evaluation and microdissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE). Testicular histology, immunofluorescence staining, and meiotic chromosome-spread analysis were used to assess spermatogenic progression. Structural modeling, immunoblotting, co-immunoprecipitation, and exploratory bulk RNA sequencing were performed using testicular material from the proband and a pooled obstructive azoospermia control reference. The three libraries per condition were technical library replicates, not independent biological replicates.
Results:
A homozygous SPDYA missense variant (NM_182756.4:c.596G>A; p.R199H) was identified in the proband, and both parents were heterozygous carriers. No additional biallelic deleterious SPDYA variants were detected in the screening cohort. The patient showed NOA, reduced testicular volume, spermatocyte-stage maturation arrest, and failed micro-TESE. Cytological analyses showed absence of post-meiotic germ cells, persistent nuclear γH2AX, failed XY body formation, and no pachytene or diplotene spermatocytes. Structural modeling and co-immunoprecipitation were compatible with weakened SPDYA-CDK2 association, and immunoblotting showed lower apparent abundance of SPDYA, CDK2, and SUN1 in the patient sample. Exploratory transcriptomic profiling showed fold-change-based tissue-level trends consistent with early meiotic arrest and loss of post-meiotic germ-cell programs, rather than direct transcriptional effects of the variant.
Conclusion:
This single case suggests that biallelic SPDYA variants may be associated with poor sperm retrieval outcomes in severe meiotic arrest, but larger multicenter cohorts are strictly required before SPDYA can be used for clinical prediction or surgical decision-making.
Related Concept Videos
Nondisjunction
Nondisjunction
Meiosis I
Meiosis II
Meiosis II
The timing and cell division patterns of meiosis differ between males and females. In male meiosis, the centrosomes are part of the formation of the meiotic spindle. However, in oocytes, including that of humans, Drosophila,...
The Y Chromosome Determines Maleness
Evolution
Around 300 million years ago, the two sex chromosomes diverged from two identical autosomal chromosomes. Over time, the Y chromosome has lost most of its genes, shrinking in size. Today,...

