Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

Isolating Human Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cells and CD4+ T cells from Sézary Syndrome Patients for Transcriptomic Profiling
Published on: October 14, 2021
Adverse events associated with systemic cutaneous T-cell lymphoma therapies: a narrative review
Krithika Nayudu1,2, Beatrix B Thompson2,3, Cecilia Larocca2,3
1Medical College of Georgia, Augusta, GA, United States.
Background:
Mycosis fungoides (MF) and Sézary syndrome (SS) are the most prevalent subtypes of cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). Systemic therapies span multiple drug classes, and as most are administered with palliative intent over prolonged periods, the adverse event (AE) profile of each agent is as clinically important as its efficacy. No comprehensive narrative review has synthesized AE data across all National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN)-recommended systemic therapies for MF/SS.
Objectives:
To summarize and compare the AE profiles of all 14 NCCN guideline-recommended systemic therapies for MF and SS, with emphasis on cutaneous toxicities and their distinction from active disease.
Methods:
Systemic therapies were identified from Version 2.2026 NCCN Guidelines for Cutaneous Lymphomas. Safety data were abstracted from available Phase II and III trials supporting guideline inclusion, with attention to AE frequency, severity, dose-limiting toxicities, and treatment discontinuation rates. PubMed and Scopus were searched for case reports and series capturing rare or delayed toxicities not represented in prospective trials. Data were narratively synthesized given heterogeneity across study designs and reporting practices.
Results:
Fourteen NCCN-recommended systemic agents were reviewed, spanning antibody-drug conjugates, monoclonal antibodies, histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitors, retinoids, antifolates, immunotoxins, cytotoxic chemotherapies, interferons, and immune checkpoint inhibitors. Toxicity profiles varied substantially by drug class. Peripheral neuropathy was the defining AE of brentuximab vedotin. Mogamulizumab was distinguished by mogamulizumab-associated rash, a treatment-emergent immune reaction that closely mimics CTCL progression. Bexarotene required proactive management of hypertriglyceridemia and central hypothyroidism. HDAC inhibitors carried gastrointestinal, hematologic, and cardiac risks, while cytotoxic agents posed variable risks of myelosuppression, mucositis, and hepatotoxicity. Immunomodulatory agents introduced risks of opportunistic infection and paradoxical disease flares.
Conclusions:
Systemic therapies for MF/SS carry distinct AE profiles that should inform treatment selection, patient counseling, and monitoring. A recurring challenge is distinguishing cutaneous drug toxicity from CTCL progression, underscoring the importance of therapy-specific toxicity awareness. Standardized AE reporting and patient-centered outcome measures are needed to optimize long-term care in this population.
Related Concept Videos
Skin Diseases and Disorders
Gram-positive Staphylococcus spp. and Streptococcus spp. are responsible for many of the most common skin infections. However, many...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Tumor Immunotherapy
Skin Cancer
Basal Cell Carcinoma (BCC): BCC is the most common type of skin cancer, accounting for about 80% of cases. It typically develops in...
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring: Affecting Factors
