Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026
Visualization of Intensity Levels to Reduce the Gap Between Self-Reported and Directly Measured Physical Activity
Published on: March 7, 2019
Validation of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire after severe COVID-19
Lin Wang1,2, Kimon Ntotsis3, James Manifield3,4
1Department of Respiratory Sciences, University of Leicester, Leicester, UK.
Background:
Physical inactivity is a risk factor for severe COVID-19 and often worsens after hospitalisation. Clinicians need quick, accurate assessments to target interventions. We aimed to assess the validity of the General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (GPPAQ) in adults recovering 1 year after COVID-19 hospitalisation.
Methods:
Post-hospitalisation for COVID-19, adults attended a 1-year-visit and completed the GPPAQ Physical Activity Index (PAI-4 active), 14-day wrist-worn accelerometry (moderate-vigorous physical activity (MVPA) active) and other health outcomes. Validity was examined via 1) internal consistency (factor analysis); 2) measurement invariance across sex, age and ethnicity using differential item functioning (DIF); 3) convergent validity (GPPAQ sensitivity/specificity versus accelerometry); and 4) construct validity (correlations with health outcomes).
Results:
752 participants had GPPAQ and accelerometry (265 female, mean±sd age 60.9±11.6 years), MVPA 18.75 min·day-1 (interquartile range 7.55-36.11), PAI-1 46.8%, PAI-2 15.6%, PAI-3 19.4% and PAI-4 18.2%. Factor analyses supported good internal consistency with two factors (daily activities and physical exercise). Comparative factor index (CFI) showed an excellent fit (CFI 0.965). DIF indicated moderate variability by sex and age. GPPAQ-PAI showed limited sensitivity (26.3%) for correctly classifying physically active individuals, but higher specificity (88.4%) for classifying physical inactivity, and weak-to-moderate correlations with health outcomes.
Conclusions:
GPPAQ demonstrates internal consistency, with construct and convergent validity in adults 1 year after COVID-19 hospitalisation. GPPAQ effectively identifies inactive individuals to support clinical care; however, its sensitivity suggests under-estimation of activity relative to accelerometry. Future pathways should combine GPPAQ with device-based assessment to optimise evaluation of physical activity to guide pulmonary rehabilitation and targeted interventions.
Related Concept Videos
01:23Assessment of the Cardiovascular System I: Subjective Data
Initial Enquiry
Ask the patient about their primary concern and thoroughly explore all reported symptoms.
Medical History
Investigate past illnesses affecting the cardiovascular system, such as angina, anemia, rheumatic fever, congenital heart disease, stroke, thrombophlebitis, dysrhythmias, varicosities
Inquire about symptoms...
01:28Physical Assessment of the Respiratory Tract I: Health History
Subjective Data
Subjective data provides vital information about the patient's health history and symptoms. This data is typically collected through interviews in which patients describe their experiences, symptoms, and concerns.
Health history and key...
01:20Exercise and Cardiovascular Response
Light to moderate physical activity initiates a series of interconnected responses in the body. The heart rate modestly increases in anticipation of the workout, followed by widespread vasodilation as oxygen consumption by skeletal muscles increases. This results in decreased peripheral resistance, increased capillary blood flow, and accelerated...