Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 23, 2026

Orientational Transition in a Liquid Crystal Triggered by the Thermodynamic Growth of Interfacial Wetting Sheets
Published on: May 15, 2017
Interfacial Coupling Rewrites the Odd-Even Effect in Molecular Junctions
Jieyi Zhang1, Siyu Tian1, Yuan Gao1
1Institute of Modern Optics and Center of Single-Molecule Science, Nankai University, Tianjin, China.
Abstract:
When all junction components, including the anchoring group, electrode materials, and molecule-electrode contact, are kept unchanged, changing only the number of molecular repeat units can induce oscillatory conductance, known as the odd-even effect. This effect is viewed as a manifestation of molecular backbone parity. However, whether such parity-dependent charge transport is intrinsically encoded by the molecular backbone or governed by molecule-electrode interfacial coupling remains unclear. Here, we show that interfacial coupling can program the odd-even conductance trend in molecular junctions. Molecules with odd-numbered repeat units exhibit higher conductance than their even-numbered homologues when coupled to EGaIn/Ga2O3 electrodes through physical van der Waals interactions. Strikingly, this trend is reversed when strong thiol-Ag chemical bonds dominate the junction interface, while replacing thiol with a weaker amino chemical anchor nearly eliminates the odd-even effect. Beyond conductance, we demonstrate that the formation probability of molecule-bridged junctions also exhibits a pronounced odd-even effect. Assisted by DFT-based calculations, we clarify the underlying mechanism, thereby establishing interfacial coupling as a design principle for programming charge transport and improving the formation yield of molecule-based devices.
More Related Videos
10:28Probing the Structure and Dynamics of Interfacial Water with Scanning Tunneling Microscopy and Spectroscopy
Published on: May 27, 2018
11:27Single-Molecule Förster Resonance Energy Transfer Methods for Real-Time Investigation of the Holliday Junction Resolution by GEN1
Published on: September 18, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Interfacial Electrochemical Methods: Overview
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the involved orbitals. The...
Theories of Dissolution: The Danckwerts' Model and Interfacial Barrier Model
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
Intermolecular vs Intramolecular Forces
Biasing of Metal-Semiconductor Junctions
In Schottky junctions, where the semiconductor is n-type, applying a positive voltage to the metal relative to the semiconductor reduces its Fermi...