Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2026
Determining Pain Detection and Tolerance Thresholds Using an Integrated, Multi-Modal Pain Task Battery
Published on: April 14, 2016
Modality and Calculation Method Influence Conditioned Pain Modulation Outcomes-An International Multisite Study
Jens Frøjk Axel Dixen1, Emma Hertel1,2, Monique van Velzen3
1Center for Neuroplasticity and Pain (CNAP), Department of Health Science and Technology, Faculty of Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
Background:
Conditioned pain modulation (CPM) is a human surrogate marker reflecting the net efficacy of descending noxious inhibitory and facilitatory control systems, but substantial variability exists. This multicenter study examined (1) associations between heat- and pressure-based CPM outcomes, (2) associations between relative and absolute CPM assessments within each pain sensitivity modality, and (3) differences in CPM effects across three countries.
Methodology:
A total of 103 participants were recruited from Denmark (n = 32), the Netherlands (n = 40), and Israel (n = 31). CPM was assessed using pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) and tonic heat as test stimuli, respectively, with the cold pressor test as the conditioning stimulus. The CPM effect was calculated as absolute and relative changes during the conditioning stimulus compared with baseline. CPM responders were defined as having a CPM larger than the lower bounds of the CPM effect's 95% confidence interval.
Results:
No correlations between heat- and pressure-based CPM outcomes were found using either absolute or relative calculations. In contrast, absolute and relative CPM effects were strongly correlated within the heat (r = 0.816, p < 0.001) and pressure (r = 0.863, p < 0.001) modalities. CPM responder classification was also not associated between pressure and heat test stimuli. Relative pressure CPM differed between countries (p = 0.009), whereas the remaining CPM outcomes did not.
Conclusion:
Using a standardized protocol across three international centers, the present findings indicate that pressure- and heat-based CPM outcomes may not be directly comparable, with significant between-country differences observed only for relative pressure CPM.
Significance Statement:
This multicenter study shows that conditioned pain modulation depends on both the type of test stimulus and how it is quantified. The findings indicate that CPM may be a more complex phenomenon and that results obtained using heat and pressure test stimuli are not directly comparable, challenging the assumption that CPM is interchangeable across methods. This methodological difference may help explain inconsistencies across previous studies. Furthermore, the data suggest that absolute pressure CPM and relative heat CPM provide more stable measures for future research.
