Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 24, 2026

Determining Soil-transmitted Helminth Infection Status and Physical Fitness of School-aged Children
Published on: August 22, 2012
Comparison of a 36-week functional training program versus traditional physical education on physical fitness in male
Tao Li1,2, Jianpeng Wu3, Jinling Wei4
1College of Physical Education and Health, East China Normal University, Shanghai, China.
Background:
Evidence comparing functional training with traditional physical education in Chinese high schools is limited. This longitudinal study compared a 36-week functional training program versus standard physical education on fitness and health markers in male adolescents.
Methods:
Male adolescents (N = 670; aged 16-18 years) from 18 high schools were allocated to a functional training group (FTG, n = 351) or traditional physical education group (TPEG, n = 319). Nineteen fitness indicators were assessed at baseline (T1), post-Phase I at 18 weeks (T2), pre-Phase II after summer holiday (T3), and post-Phase II at 36 weeks (T4). Analyses compared T1 vs. T2 (18-week effects) and T1 vs. T4 (36-week effects); T3 served as a pre-Phase II reassessment and was not analyzed as an outcome time point. Linear mixed models (LMMs) with baseline adjustment and school-level random intercepts served as the primary analysis, with t-tests and repeated-measures ANOVA as secondary analyses.
Results:
LMMs revealed significant group effects favoring FTG for cardiovascular endurance (resting pulse: -2.34 bpm, 95% CI [-4.26, -0.42], d = 0.24; 1,000-m run: -15.36 s, 95% CI [-20.03, -10.69], d = 0.53), muscular strength (1RM squat: +2.81 kg, 95% CI [1.95, 3.67], d = 0.45; pull-ups: +0.61 reps, 95% CI [0.24, 0.98], d = 0.21), agility (T-test: -0.22 s, 95% CI [-0.40, -0.04], d = 0.26), and balance (closed-eye single-leg stance: +21.32 s, 95% CI [10.68, 31.96], d = 0.41). Time×group interactions were significant for BMI (p = 0.012), body fat percentage (p = 0.003), lung capacity (p < 0.001), 1RM squat (p < 0.001), pull-ups (p = 0.001), and maximum squat repetitions (p = 0.006). Movement quality indicators (FMS) showed significant effects only after 36 weeks, with FTG attenuating the decline in trunk stability (p = 0.026), hurdle steps (p = 0.012), and rotational stability (p = 0.040) compared to TPEG. Body composition showed limited between-group differences at individual time points despite significant interactions.
Conclusion:
A 36-week structured progressive exercise program was associated with greater improvements in cardiovascular endurance, muscular strength, and agility than traditional physical education among male adolescents, with duration-dependent adaptations. However, differential attrition (FTG: 46.7% vs. TPEG: 37.3% at 36 weeks) and the absence of dietary control warrant cautious interpretation.
More Related Videos
12:59Improving Strength, Power, Muscle Aerobic Capacity, and Glucose Tolerance through Short-term Progressive Strength Training Among Elderly People
Published on: July 5, 2017
07:30Muscle Imbalances: Testing and Training Functional Eccentric Hamstring Strength in Athletic Populations
Published on: May 1, 2018
Related Concept Videos
Longitudinal Research
Exercise and Muscle Performance
Endurance exercises
Endurance exercises involve running, swimming, or cycling, which require repetitive movements with low force output. When a person engages in endurance exercise, a few noticeable changes occur in their skeletal muscles. For instance, the number of capillaries...