Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 25, 2026

Fingerprinting Cardiolipin in Leukocytes by Mass Spectrometry for a Rapid Diagnosis of Barth Syndrome
Published on: March 23, 2022
Symptom Burden and Clinical Clues in Gitelman Syndrome and Pseudo-Gitelman Syndrome
Yuta Inoki1, Tomoko Horinouchi1, Atsushi Kondo1
1Department of Pediatrics, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Hyogo, Japan.
Background:
Gitelman syndrome and pseudo-Gitelman syndrome share overlapping biochemical abnormalities, complicating clinical differentiation and genetic testing allocation. While Gitelman syndrome impairs health-related quality of life (QOL), the comparable burden in pseudo-Gitelman syndrome remains unclear. We compared QOL burden and symptom profiles between individuals with genetically confirmed Gitelman syndrome and those classified as pseudo-Gitelman syndrome.
Methods:
We evaluated 128 participants aged ≥10 years referred for genetic testing due to suspected Gitelman syndrome (hypokalemia and metabolic alkalosis). Participants were divided into a Gitelman syndrome subgroup (genetically confirmed biallelic SLC12A3 variants; n=66) and a pseudo-Gitelman syndrome subgroup (no disease-causing variants; n=62). Seventy controls were frequency-matched to Gitelman syndrome by age and sex. QOL and clinical manifestations were assessed using a structured 21-item questionnaire covering taste, urinary, muscle, and nonspecific symptom domains. To limit false-positive findings from multiple comparisons, P values were adjusted using the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure; the resulting adjusted P values (q values) <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
Results:
Total QOL scores indicated significant and comparable impairment in both the Gitelman syndrome and pseudo-Gitelman syndrome subgroups versus controls (both q <0.001), with no significant difference between the affected groups (q = 0.33). Despite similar overall burdens, specific clinical features differed between the groups. Nocturnal enuresis scores were higher in Gitelman syndrome group than in pseudo-Gitelman syndrome group and controls (both q < 0.001); 50% of Gitelman syndrome participants reported persistence at least until elementary school entry. The taste-related domain was higher in Gitelman syndrome group than in pseudo-Gitelman syndrome group (q = 0.01), but no individual taste item differed after correction.
Conclusions:
Individuals with pseudo-Gitelman syndrome experienced QOL impairment comparable to those with genetically confirmed Gitelman syndrome. However, the severity and duration of nocturnal enuresis and overall taste-related symptom burden were prominent descriptive features of Gitelman syndrome. Systematic symptom assessment may contribute to a more comprehensive clinical characterization of individuals with suspected Gitelman syndrome.
Related Concept Videos
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease II: Clinical Features and Management
Clinical Manifestations
GERD presents itself in a multitude of ways, with symptoms varying from person to person. The hallmark symptoms are...
Irritable Bowel Syndrome II: Clinical Features and Diagnostic Evaluation
Irritable Bowel Syndrome (IBS) is classified into subtypes based on the predominant bowel habits as determined by the Bristol Stool Form Scale (BSFS). The subtypes are:
Giardiasis
Assessment of the Gastrointestinal System I: Subjective Data
Health History
The initial step in assessing the GI system is obtaining a comprehensive health history. This includes inquiring about the patient's history or presence of problems related to...
Inflammatory Bowel Disease IV: Clinical Manifestations
Peptic Ulcer Disease III: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Studies
Few clinical manifestations differentiate gastric ulcers from duodenal ulcers. Distinctions in the location, timing, and pain relief are crucial for healthcare providers in differentiating between gastric and duodenal ulcers during clinical assessments.
