Related Experiment Videos
An integrated explainable AI framework with counterfactual optimization for decision support
Nusrat Jahan1, Jannatul Maua2, Uland Rozario2
1Department of Business Administration and Management, Washington University of Science and Technology, Alexandria, Virginia, United States of America.
Abstract:
Artificial intelligence is increasingly used to support managerial decision-making in domains such as human resource management and customer relationship management; however, the lack of transparency in complex predictive models limits their practical adoption. This paper proposes a counterfactual-guided explainable artificial intelligence framework that integrates deep learning, feature attribution, and counterfactual reasoning to deliver accurate, interpretable, and actionable managerial insights. The proposed model is evaluated on an employee attrition dataset and a customer churn dataset, as well as in a combined multi-domain setting. Experimental results show that the framework achieves classification accuracies of up to 91.4% for employee attrition prediction and 87.3% for customer churn prediction, with corresponding ROC-AUC scores reaching 0.869 and 0.891, respectively. The model also demonstrates improved probability calibration, reducing the Brier score to 0.128 on the attrition dataset and 0.109 on the churn dataset. Furthermore, explainability analysis yields higher SHAP fidelity scores exceeding 0.90, while the counterfactual module generates valid and plausible recommendations with lower action costs compared to baseline approaches. These results indicate that the proposed framework effectively bridges predictive performance, interpretability, and actionability, making it suitable for real-world managerial decision-support systems. The framework is formulated as a constraint-aware optimization problem that integrates predictive modeling, explanation fidelity, and cost-sensitive counterfactual generation into a unified objective, enabling actionable and feasible decision support.
Related Concept Videos
Counterfactual Thinking
Decision Making
Automatic decision-making is fast, intuitive, and relies on gut feelings...
Decision Making: P-value Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is proposed. The claim is based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to the claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses: a null hypothesis would be a neutral statement while the alternative hypothesis can have a...
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Heuristics
People often rely on heuristics when faced with an overload of information, limited time, low importance of the decision, limited information, or when a heuristic readily comes to mind. For...
Multi-input and Multi-variable systems
In the absence of...