Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Ultrasound-guided Botulinum Toxin-A Injections: A Method of Treating Sialorrhea
Published on: November 9, 2016
Pain-Specific Benefits of Higher-Dose Neubotulinum Toxin Type A in Cervical Dystonia: A Multicenter Randomized
Arkhom Arayawichanont1, Subsai Kongsaengdao2,3,4
1Division of Neurology, Department of Medicine, Sunpasitthiprasong Hospital, Ubon Ratchathani 34000, Thailand.
Abstract:
Pain is a major contributor to disability in cervical dystonia (CD) and may persist despite improvement in abnormal head posture after botulinum toxin treatment. Whether increasing the dose of Neubotulinum toxin type A (Neu-BoNT-A) provides additional analgesic benefit without compromising safety remains uncertain. In this prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, two-period crossover trial, 50 adults with CD were randomized 1:1 to Neu-BoNT-A 100 U followed by 50 U or 50 U followed by 100 U, with each treatment period lasting 12 weeks. The principal between-dose TWSTRS analysis used a crossover mixed-effects model including treatment, period, and randomized sequence, with participant as a random effect. TWSTRS total, severity, and disability did not differ significantly between regimens. Neu-BoNT-A 100 U produced greater improvement in TWSTRS pain (adjusted 100 U minus 50 U difference, -1.83 points; 95% CI, -2.93 to -0.73; p = 0.0011). The pain finding remained significant in a robust GEE sensitivity analysis (difference, -1.83 points; 95% CI, -3.04 to -0.62; p = 0.003). CDIP-58 psychosocial functioning also improved more with 100 U (nominal p = 0.001). In a Holm sensitivity analysis across all 24 efficacy comparisons, TWSTRS pain and CDIP-58 psychosocial functioning remained significant (adjusted p ≈ 0.025 and 0.024, respectively); no other comparison remained significant. No serious adverse events occurred. Neu-BoNT-A 100 U did not improve overall CD severity compared with 50 U but was associated with greater pain relief and improved psychosocial functioning without compromising tolerability. These secondary findings remained significant after multiplicity adjustment but should be interpreted in the context of the nonsignificant overall TWSTRS result and require confirmation.
Related Concept Videos
Directly Acting Muscle Relaxants: Dantrolene and Botulinum Toxin
The binding of dantrolene to the RYR1...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Therapeutic Uses
Depolarizing Blockers: Pharmocokinetics
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Pharmacological Actions
Although all competitive neuromuscular blockers are designed...
Skeletal Muscle Relaxants: Adverse Effects
Unlike...
Nondepolarizing (Competitive) Neuromuscular Blockers: Mechanism of Action
Competitive antagonists prevent acetylcholine from binding to its receptor, inhibiting membrane depolarization. Without conformational changes or intrinsic...