Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 26, 2026

Effects of Mechanical Methods Used in Peri-implantitis Treatment on Implant Surface Decontamination and Roughness
Published on: March 14, 2025
Risk factors for dental implant failure in vascularized bone flaps: a decade-long cohort study
A R Tofighbakhsh1, G W Jenkins2, C C Lee1
1University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MA, USA.
Abstract:
This study aims to evaluate the survival of dental implants placed exclusively within vascularized osseous free flaps for oral cavity reconstruction and to identify key risk factors for implant failure. A retrospective cohort study was conducted on 105 patients who received 358 dental implants within fibula, scapula, or deep circumflex iliac artery free flaps at a single institution over a 10-year period. The primary outcome was implant failure, defined as removal for any reason. Statistical analysis employed multivariate mixed-effects Cox regression models to account for patient-level clustering and confounding variables, including adjuvant radiotherapy, jaw location, donor site, and smoking status. Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated cumulative implant survival rates of 93.4% at 1 year, 89.2% at 2 years, and 83.9% at 3 years following implant placement. Implant survival remained relatively stable thereafter. Multivariate analysis identified two significant independent risk factors for implant failure: exposure to adjuvant radiotherapy (hazard ratio (HR): 3.46, P = 0.009) and placement in a reconstructed maxilla compared to the mandible (HR: 3.00, P = 0.040). The most common causes of failure were infection/peri-implantitis (68.5%) and osteoradionecrosis. Donor site type and smoking status were not significantly associated with failure in the adjusted model. Dental implants placed in vascularized bone flaps provide a viable rehabilitation method, though failure rates are higher. Adjuvant radiotherapy and maxillary location are the most critical risk factors, increasing the hazard of failure by approximately 3.5- and 3-fold, respectively. These findings underscore the need for careful patient selection and tailored approaches in this complex population.
