Evorpacept plus trastuzumab, ramucirumab and paclitaxel in HER2-positive gastric cancer: a randomized phase 2 trial
Kohei Shitara1, Zev Wainberg2, Josep Tabernero3
1National Cancer Center Hospital East, Kashiwa-shi, Japan.
Abstract:
Evorpacept blocks the CD47-signal regulatory protein α interaction, enhancing antibody-dependent cellular phagocytosis. In the phase 2 portion of ASPEN-06 (a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2/3 study), 127 patients with pretreated, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-overexpressing, advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer were randomized to evorpacept plus trastuzumab, ramucirumab and paclitaxel (evo + TRP; n = 63; fresh HER2+ biopsy, n = 22) or TRP alone (n = 64; fresh HER2+ biopsy, n = 26). The primary end point was investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). The primary analysis of ORR was designed to evaluate an ORR exceeding the historical 30% benchmark (ramucirumab/paclitaxel) (80% power for intent to treat (ITT) and 50% power for the ITT subpopulation (HER2 overexpression based on a post-trastuzumab 'fresh' biopsy)) and an improvement of ≥8.0% and ≥9.7% versus TRP in the ITT and ITT subpopulations, respectively. Key secondary end points included ORR by blinded independent central review, duration of response and progression-free survival by investigator or blinded independent central review, overall survival and safety. Post hoc biomarker analyses, including the assessment of the association of treatment efficacy with retained HER2 status (defined by HER2 positivity on fresh tumor biopsy or amplification in circulating tumor DNA analysis) and CD47 expression in tumor samples, were conducted. The investigator-assessed ORRs were 40.3% (evo + TRP) versus 26.6% (TRP) in the ITT population and 54.8% versus 23.1% in the fresh biopsy HER2+ subgroup. ORR differences (13.7% and 31.7%) exceeded the prespecified thresholds in both the ITT population and fresh biopsy HER2+ subgroup, meeting one of the two primary objectives; however, compared to the historical benchmark (30%), ORRs in the ITT population (40.3%; P = 0.0949, one-sided) and fresh biopsy HER2+ subgroup (54.8%; P = 0.030, one-sided) did not meet the prespecified statistical criterion (one-sided α = 0.025). While hematologic toxicities were more common with evo + TRP, overall safety was similar. In summary, evo + TRP showed encouraging efficacy with manageable safety in advanced gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05002127 .
Related Concept Videos
Treatment Resistent Cancers
Treatment Resistant Cancers
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against specific...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...


