When fear meets knowledge: The effects of risk aversion and policy information on sustainable pig carcass disposal under government regulation
Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Transition of Farm Pigs to Research Pigs using a Designated Checklist followed by Initiation of Clicker Training - a Refinement Initiative
Published on: August 21, 2021
Lulu Tou1, Junying Cao2, Jianhua Wang2
1China Academy for Rural Development, School of Public Affairs, Zhejiang University, 866 Yuhangtang Road, Hangzhou, 310058, China.
Abstract:
Against the backdrop of recurrent African swine fever (ASF) outbreaks, this study establishes a behavioral baseline for carcass governance under China's pre-crisis regulatory environment. Integrating the fear appeal framework with mental accounting theory, we draw on unique household survey data to estimate how farmers' risk aversion toward command-and-control policies and their policy information acquisition ability shape sustainable disposal behavior. Our results show that fines exert limited deterrent effects, likely because they are encoded as manageable operating costs. Conversely, risk aversion toward detention significantly increases compliance. Furthermore, information acquisition ability directly promotes sustainable practices and amplifies the deterrent effect of detention. By establishing these micro-foundations, we identify detention and information navigation as central behavioral mechanisms within the regulatory toolkit under normal pre-ASF conditions. This provides a benchmark reference for capturing psychological processing mechanisms underlying responses to command-and-control policies and offers a robust pathway for advancing sustainable waste management in developing contexts.
Related Concept Videos
Framing Effects
Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP)
Social Traps
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...

