Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
Federated Simplex-Constrained Network for Fine-Grained Clock Drawing Test Scoring and Cognitive Pattern
Dingyi Liu1, Lei Yu2
1Shanxi University, Taiyuan, Shanxi, China, Taiyuan, 030006, China.
Abstract:
The Clock Drawing Test is a core tool for the early screening of cognitive impairment. Traditional manual methods are time-consuming and prone to significant subjective bias, while most existing automated methods are "black-box" approaches that directly map images to scores or category labels. Not only do these methods lack interpretability in their decision-making processes, but they also fail to provide information beyond the raw scores. Furthermore, most of these methods employ a centralized training paradigm. However, due to strict privacy regulations that restrict medical data sharing, achieving multi-center collaboration remains difficult, which hinders clinical deployment. Therefore, this paper proposes the Federated Simplex-Constrained Network (Fed-SCN), which enables collaborative training through federated learning without raw data leaving the local clients; simultaneously, by embedding a simplex-constrained module in the model, a module that serves both as a latent-feature transformation layer and as a cognitive-pattern modeling module, it represents individual cognitive patterns of samples as convex combinations of multiple cognitive prototypes, thereby constructing a task-relevant library of cognitive prototypes. This approach simultaneously achieves fine-grained scoring, interpretability of the decision-making process, and cognitive pattern analysis. Performance experiments were conducted on a dataset of 1,370 cross-sectional clock-drawing images collected from a single institution, using the Dirichlet partitioning method to simulate multi-federated clients with highly skewed label distributions. The main experimental results show that this model achieved a macro-average accuracy of 0.847 (95% CI: 0.841-0.854) and a macro-average F1 score of 0.470 (95% CI: 0.405-0.536) on the scoring task. .
