Related Experiment Videos
Grade 3 Lung Carcinoids/NETs: The IASLC Pathology Committee Study with Proposal of a New Diagnostic Category
Natasha Rekhtman1, Matthew G Hanna2, Paul Hofman3
1Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Introduction:
Lung carcinoids are well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NETs), designated in the current thoracic WHO classification as typical carcinoids (grade 1) and atypical carcinoids (grade 2), whereas rare tumors with carcinoid/NET morphology and >10 mitoses/2mm2 are designated as large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). This approach, however, has been a matter of growing debate.
Methods:
Lung resections of tumors with carcinoid/NET morphology and >10 mitoses/2 mm2 were contributed by the members of IASLC Pathology Committee. Digitized slides and detailed clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and molecular data were collected and analyzed.
Results:
In total, 28 cases meeting the study criteria were collected from 9 institutions in 6 countries. Tumors exhibited mean mitotic counts of 15/2mm2 (range, 11-30/2mm2) and mean hot-spot Ki-67 rate of 32% (range 13-54%). In all cases, Ki-67 was heterogeneous, containing cold-spot zones with Ki-67 of <1%-15%. In all cases, Rb and p53 showed wild-type pattern by immunohistochemistry. Next-generation sequencing (n=9) revealed wild-type RB1 and TP53, low TMB (1.3-3.3 mutations/Mb), and genomic alterations characteristic of lung carcinoids. The study cohort exhibited significantly worse OS and RFS than control groups of 117 typical and 52 atypical carcinoids (P<0.0001 for all comparisons).
Conclusion:
In this international multi-institutional study, we address a major unresolved issue for WHO classification. By assembling the largest cohort to-date of the study cases, we propose that they should be classified as grade 3 carcinoids/NETs rather than LCNEC to enable clinical management more aligned with their biology. The concurrent IASLC proposal to include Ki-67 as additional criterion for grade 3 carcinoids should further enhance this approach.