Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

A Method for Tracking the Time Evolution of Steady-State Evoked Potentials
Published on: May 25, 2019
Online Signal-to-Noise Management for Evoked Potentials-Assessing and Explaining Response Quality
Gerald Fischer1, Maria E Holzknecht2, Jens Haueisen3
1Institute of Electrical and Biomedical Engineering, UMIT TIROL-Private University for Health Sciences and Health Technology, Eduard Wallnoefer Zentrum 1, 6060 Hall in Tirol, Austria.
Abstract:
(1) Background: Evoked potentials (EPs) are an elegant, non-invasive, and reliable technique for assessing the functional integrity of neural pathways. They are, however, often limited by the difficulty and time needed to consistently distinguish signal from noise. (2) Methods: We have recently proposed a novel technique based on spectral domain evoked-to-background ratio (EBR) that enables fast data acquisition with online feedback about actual signal quality utilizing state of the art analog-to-digital conversion. Furthermore, we have developed a novel model-based signal-to-noise management concept allowing for suppression of biological and technical interference (swallowing, stimulation artifacts, electropolarization, and powerline potentials) and for online assessment of signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) for EPs. In this work, we experimentally confirmed this concept in ten healthy volunteers by investigating cortical EPs and high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) following median nerve stimulation. (3) Results: Both mathematical model and human data demonstrate that spectral target-band EBR governs the progress in SNR with increasing sweep count. For cortical EPs, SNR exceeded 10 dB beyond 90 averages in all participants. An SNR > 20 dB documented excellent signal quality and reproducibility. For HFOs, the SNR shifted to lower values by 12 dB, displaying pronounced individual variation, however, with smaller variation of HFO-band background activity (1.9 vs. 7.6 dB between the 25% and 75% percentile). Thus, individual HFO responses are more important for actual signal extraction compared to background activity. In subjects displaying a high HFO amplitude, reproducibility was confirmed for less than 1000 sweeps. (4) Conclusions: The present investigations confirm that individual EBR is the major factor defining SNR. Background noise can be reduced to a negligible level. Online assessment of background activity will allow for the most accurate moment-to-moment visualization of raw signal quality. This will facilitate termination of the data acquisition and may be based on quantified signal quality rather than predefined sweep count.

