Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Assessment of Stress Effects on Cognitive Flexibility using an Operant Strategy Shifting Paradigm
Published on: May 4, 2020
Psychological Inflexibility and Psychological Distress in Adults: The Mediating Role of Resilience
Miluska Moreyra-Ruiz1, Jonatan Baños-Chaparro2
1Escuela de Posgrado, Universidad Ricardo Palma, Lima 15046, Peru.
Abstract:
Introduction: The high prevalence of anxiety and depression in adults affects their overall functioning. Within Relational Frame Theory, psychological inflexibility is theoretically associated with avoidance of private events and has been linked to greater anxiety and depressive symptoms and lower resilience. However, the integration of these constructs into explanatory models remains limited, restricting the understanding of their interrelationships and potentially relevant protective resources. Objective: To examine the indirect association between psychological inflexibility and psychological distress through resilience within a theoretically specified cross-sectional model. Methods: A cross-sectional design with latent variables was employed using a quantitative approach. The sample consisted of 950 Peruvian adults (64% women), recruited in Metropolitan Lima, who completed a sociodemographic questionnaire and psychological measures. Statistical analyses were conducted using structural equation modeling. Results: The proposed model demonstrated adequate fit (robust CFI = 0.94, robust RMSEA = 0.05, 90% CI [0.050, 0.057], SRMR = 0.04). Psychological inflexibility showed a strong positive direct association with psychological distress (β = 0.803, p < 0.001) and a significant indirect association through resilience (β = 0.073, p < 0.001]). This pattern was consistent with complementary mediation within the specified cross-sectional model. Conclusions: Higher psychological inflexibility was associated with lower resilience and greater psychological distress. Resilience statistically accounted for a small but significant portion of the association between psychological inflexibility and distress, whereas the direct association remained predominant. Given the cross-sectional design, these findings should not be interpreted as evidence of temporal or causal relationships. Longitudinal research is required to examine the directionality of these associations.
Related Concept Videos
Unrealistic Optimism Bias
Stress Prevention and Stress Management Techniques II
Type A Personality: Driven and Easily Stressed
Individuals with Type A personalities are often highly competitive and ambitious and operate with a strong sense of urgency. Commonly labeled as "workaholics," they...
Psychological Responses to Stress
Self-Serving Bias
Erikson's Theory on Socioemotional Development during Adulthood
Intimacy Versus Isolation in Early Adulthood
Individuals in early adulthood, from the 20s...
Ethnic Identity within a Larger Culture