Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Cortical Source Analysis of High-Density EEG Recordings in Children
Published on: June 30, 2014
The Cortical Source of the P300 ERP Generator in the Associative Learning Task: A Consensus of Four Inversion
Daniyar Kalmagambetov1,2, Mikhail Ye Mel'nikov1,2, Manzura Zholdassova1,2
1Department of Biophysics, Biomedicine, and Neuroscience, Farabi University, Almaty 050040, Kazakhstan.
Abstract:
Background: Associative learning, the process of binding stimuli, responses, and outcomes, is critical for behavioral adaptation. While event-related potentials (ERPs) like the P300 effectively index the cognitive effort and context updating required during trial-and-error learning, the precise cortical generators of these signals and their shift across development remain difficult to isolate due to the electroencephalography (EEG) inverse problem. The aim of the study was to examine the differences in P300 localization depending on the associative learning task stage and participants' age. Methods: A total of 148 participants (aged 7-21) completed a visual-motor associative learning task while undergoing 64-channel EEG recording. Source localization was performed over the 300-500 ms (P300) time window as a conjunction of results of four inversion algorithms at FWE-corrected p < 0.05: multiple sparse priors with greedy search (GS), independent and identically distributed (IID), low-resolution electromagnetic tomography (LOR), and empirical Bayes beamformer (EBB). Exploratory three-algorithm (IID, LOR, and EBB) conjunction analysis results were also reported. Results: A spatial convergence analysis of Early > Late-stage differential maps revealed a consensus across all four models for both cue Onset-locked (right inferior parietal lobule/angular gyrus) and Feedback-locked (occipital, temporal (including bilateral middle temporal gyrus), and orbitofrontal regions) activity. The exploratory three-algorithm analysis additionally implicated left middle temporal gyrus and angular gyrus for cue Onset-locked rule acquisition. No results were produced for age-related effect surviving either the four-algorithm or three-algorithm consensus criterion. Conclusions: This multi-algorithm consensus links active rule search to distributed cortical pattern, involving angular (for cue stimulus processing) and middle temporal gyri (for feedback processing), while no age-related changes in these areas have been demonstrated.
