Related Experiment Videos
Beyond Access and Awareness: The Role of Patient Experience and Physician Communication in Cervical Cancer Screening
Richárd Tóth1,2, Pál Sebok1, Cosette Spanics1,2
1Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Semmelweis University, 1082 Budapest, Hungary.
Background/Objectives:
To evaluate cervical cancer screening participation among women in Hungary and to identify motivators, barriers, experiences, and social factors associated with screening attendance.
Methods:
A cross-sectional survey with nationwide recruitment was conducted between November 2023 and September 2024 using non-probability voluntary sampling through a patient-foundation campaign, social media and other online communication channels, and community-based distribution of paper questionnaires. The survey assessed cervical cancer screening participation, time since last screening, screening frequency, healthcare setting, screening-related experiences, and perceived motivators and barriers. Sociodemographic and lifestyle characteristics, self-rated health, and communication about screening within the social environment were also collected. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics and subgroup comparisons. Associations were evaluated using chi-square tests with effect sizes reported as Cramér's V. Responses to open-ended questions were analyzed using qualitative content analysis.
Results:
A total of 5196 women were included in the analysis. Overall, 59.8% reported screening within the past year, while 17.3% attended more than two years earlier and 3.5% never went for screening. Screening participation was highest among women aged 25-54 years and lower among younger and older age groups. Communication about screening within the social environment was associated with more recent and more regular attendance. The proportion reporting screening within the past year was highest among women aged 25-54 years and lower among younger and older age groups. Women who reported discussing cervical cancer screening within their social environment were more likely to report recent and regular screening attendance. Screening experiences were generally favorable, although physical and emotional aspects were rated less positively. The most frequently reported motivation for attending screening was consciousness/health awareness, whereas major barriers included negative healthcare experiences, limited access to services, cost of private care, fear of diagnosis, and time constraints.
Conclusions:
Cervical cancer screening participation in this sample was high but varied across demographic, experiential, and social factors. Age and communication about screening were the factors most strongly associated with screening behavior, while structural barriers and negative healthcare experiences were common answers for reduced participation.
Related Concept Videos
Barriers to Effective Communication II
Cultural barriers:
Differences in values, beliefs, religion, knowledge, and tradition can significantly impact communication. Awareness of nonverbal cues is critical, especially when conversing with a patient from a different culture. What appears appropriate in one culture may be inappropriate in another.
Semantic barriers:
As a result of their tendency to use...
Nursing Ethical Principles II
Consider the following scenario, which illustrates how these principles are applied in the care of Mr. John, a fifty-year-old teacher diagnosed with metastatic liver cancer.
Initially, Mr. John's cancer...
Primary Healthcare Services
In 1978, international leaders convened in Alma-Ata, Kazakhstan, for what would be a pivotal event in global health. The Alma-Ata Declaration was the first to call...
Patient-centered Care
Ethical Standards II
Nurses are entrusted with upholding various ethical principles and standards. Nurses forge solid therapeutic relationships using trust, empathy, autonomy, confidentiality, and professional competence.
Confidentiality is crucial, embodying respect for individual privacy and...
Preventive Healthcare Services