Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 27, 2026

Mechanical Expansion of Steel Tubing as a Solution to Leaky Wellbores
Published on: November 20, 2014
Rheological Response, Strength Development and Conditional Age-Progressive Strength Updating of Cement Kiln
Chong Chen1,2, Wenquan Duan1, Junsheng Ma1
1Norin Mining Limited, Beijing 100035, China.
Abstract:
Cement kiln dust (CKD) can partially replace Portland cement in cemented tailings backfill, but its application must satisfy both pipeline transportability and mechanical strength requirements. This study aims to evaluate the rheological and mechanical evolution of a low-carbon CKD-modified backfill to optimize its transport-strength trade-off. This study introduced a binder containing 10% CKD and 90% ordinary Portland cement at a binder-to-tailings ratio of 1:6. Thirteen single-factor mixtures were prepared to examine silica fume (0-7% of binder), sodium silicate (0-4%), polycarboxylate powder (0-0.40%), and solids mass concentration (72-74%). The Bingham yield stress and plastic viscosity were determined in the fresh state, and unconfined compressive strength (UCS) was determined after 3, 7, 28, and 56 d. Increasing polycarboxylate dosage strongly reduced yield stress, whereas raising solids concentration from 72% to 74% increased yield stress from 5.82 to 58.83 Pa and plastic viscosity from 0.0953 to 0.2889 Pa·s. Silica fume increased 56 d UCS from 1.39 to 2.28 MPa, while sodium silicate mainly improved early-age strength and produced non-monotonic later-age responses. At 74% solids, the 56 d UCS reached 2.54 MPa, accompanied by substantially higher rheological resistance. This study introduces a path-dependent, age-progressive framework to improve backfill strength prediction accuracy. A conditional age-progressive regression model was developed using min-max normalized mix variables and the measured UCS at the preceding age. In-sample R2 values were 0.9697-0.9805 for 7-56 d; leave-one-out validation with measured prior-age UCS gave R2 values of 0.7951-0.8198. The model should therefore be interpreted as a field-updating tool after early-age testing rather than as an independently validated design-only predictor. The results quantify the transport-strength trade-off within the investigated materials and dosage ranges.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Strength and Heat of Hydration
The heat of hydration for each cement compound is significant; for instance, tricalcium aluminate (C3A) and...
Types of Cement I
Type I (Ordinary Portland Cement) is widely used for general construction where special properties are not required. It has moderate sulfate resistance and heat of hydration.
Type II (Modified Cement) offers moderate resistance to sulfate attack and a lower rate of heat development compared to Type I. It is suitable for structures in...
Strength of Cement
For compressive strength tests, ASTM C 109-05 standards prescribe a cement-sand mix ratio of 1:2.75 and a water/cement ratio of 0.485 for making 2-inch cubes. These cubes are mixed, cast, and cured in saturated lime water at 23°C until testing. Flexural strength testing, outlined in ASTM C...
Soundness of Cement
Types of Cement II
Design Example: Managing Concrete Workability
To address...

