Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

Computational Prediction of Amino Acid Preferences of Potentially Multispecific Peptide-Binding Domains Involved in Protein-Protein Interactions
Published on: January 26, 2024
Learning Protein-Protein Binding Free Energies from Interface Graphs and Physicochemical Descriptors
1The University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53211, United States.
Abstract:
Predicting protein-protein binding free energy (ΔG) from structure remains a central challenge in computational biophysics. Here, we present GULP (Graph-based Unified Learning for Protein binding), a graph neural network (GNN) that jointly learns from a residue-level graph representation of the binding interface and global physicochemical descriptors. We systematically investigate how training data distribution affects model performance by comparing a full training set with a balanced subset enriched for extreme-affinity complexes. GULP is computationally efficient and provides interpretable insights into residue-level and physicochemical contributions to binding. On external validation, GULP achieves a mean absolute error (MAE) of 2.31 kcal/mol and shows moderate agreement with experimental ΔG values (Pearson r = 0.54, Spearman ρ = 0.58).
Related Concept Videos
Protein-protein Interfaces
Protein-Protein Interfaces
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
The Equilibrium Binding Constant and Binding Strength
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...
Conserved Binding Sites
Binding sites are often located in large pockets, and if their location on a protein’s surface is unknown, it can be predicted using various approaches. The energetic method computationally analyses the...

