Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 28, 2026

A New Technique for Treating Low-risk Prostate Cancer—Super Active Surveillance
Published on: November 7, 2025
Patients with high-risk features on active surveillance for prostate cancer
Sophie Goodman1,2, Yajat Dua1, Henry Y C Pan1
1Department of Urology, Royal Melbourne Hospital, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.
Background/Objectives:
With the increasing incidence of prostate cancer worldwide, active surveillance (AS) remains a cornerstone in the management of men with low-risk disease. While the criteria for AS in low-risk prostate cancer are well established, its appropriateness for men with higher-risk features is less clearly defined. This review aims to evaluate the evidence supporting AS in men with a family history of prostate cancer, Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) 4 or 5 lesions, and favorable intermediate-risk International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Grade Group (GG) 2 disease.
Methods:
A comprehensive literature review was conducted using PubMed, Embase, and The Cochrane Library. Eligible studies included those assessing outcomes of AS in men with higher-risk features, including family history of prostate or associated malignancies, PI-RADS 4-5 lesions on magnetic resonance imaging, or favorable risk ISUP GG2 disease. Studies were excluded if participants had a life expectancy of less than 10 years or had previously received definitive treatment for prostate cancer.
Results:
Recent evidence suggests that a family history of prostate cancer may confer an increased risk of disease progression on AS; however, current data do not justify exclusion from surveillance on this basis alone. Two single-center studies demonstrated that men with PI-RADS 5 lesions at AS enrolment exhibited a higher rate of disease upgrading, with 70% progressing to ISUP GG2 and 25-33% to GG3 or higher at confirmatory biopsy. Increasing evidence supports the inclusion of selected men with favorable GG2 disease in AS protocols, provided the absence of high-risk clinical, biochemical, or radiological features. Approximately 50% may require definitive treatment within five years.
Conclusions:
AS remains a viable management option for appropriately selected men with higher-risk features, accompanied by rigorous monitoring and informed patient counselling. The emerging role of prostate-specific membrane antigen positron emission tomography imaging in risk stratification for intermediate-risk disease warrants further investigation through prospective studies.
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Vaccines
Cancer vaccines come in two categories: preventive (prophylactic) and treatment (active). Preventive vaccines, such as the Human Papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine, protect against viruses that cause certain...
Cancer Survival Analysis
