Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 29, 2026

Understanding the Effects of Non-Invasive Transauricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation on EEG and HRV
Published on: January 19, 2024
Safety, Acceptability and Efficacy of Noninvasive Transcutaneous-Autonomic Neuromodulation in Uncontrolled
Ajay Gupta1,2,3,4,5, David Collier1, James Steckelmacher1,2,3
1William Harvey Research Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom (A.G., D.C., J.S., G.C., O.Z., M.P., M.S., A.A.).
Background:
Despite antihypertensive medications, ≈40% of patients with hypertension fail to achieve recommended blood pressure (BP) targets. Alternative device-based strategies are often expensive or invasive. We evaluated the safety, acceptability, and potential efficacy of a noninvasive transcutaneous autonomic neuromodulation (tAN) device.
Methods:
SCRATCH-HTN (Sham Controlled Randomized Trial Evaluating the Safety, Acceptability and Efficacy of Autonomic Neuromodulation using Transcutaneous Vagal Sensory Stimulation in Uncontrolled Hypertensive Patients) was a double-blind, sham-controlled, phase 2a trial enrolling patients with uncontrolled hypertension (mean daytime systolic BP [SBP] ≥135 mm Hg and diastolic BP ≥85 mm Hg) on 1 or more medications. Participants self-administered active tAN or sham treatment for 30 minutes daily for 14 days, then 10 weekly sessions. Primary end points were safety and acceptability. The primary efficacy end point was change in daytime ambulatory SBP from baseline to 3 months. Secondary end points included BP, heart rate, and quality of life at 1 and 3 months.
Results:
Sixty-three patients (mean age 47.2 years, 71.4% male, mean daytime BP 150/95 mm Hg) were randomized 2:1 to tAN or sham. tAN did not differ significantly from sham in daytime ambulatory SBP at 3 months (between-group difference, 2.35 mm Hg [95% CI, -4.37 to 9.07]; P=0.49) or 1 month (-1.01 mm Hg [-6.87 to 4.85]; P=0.73). Pre-specified adjusted analysis identified a significant interaction between treatment and baseline SBP (P interaction 0.003): participants with baseline SBP >160 mm Hg showed a greater response to tAN. No significant differences were observed for other secondary end points. tAN was safe and acceptable.
Conclusions:
tAN is safe and well-tolerated in patients with hypertension. No significant BP-lowering effect was demonstrated, although a potential benefit in subgroups or a modest effect in a larger cohort cannot be excluded and warrants evaluation.
Registration:
URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT05179343. URL: XXX; Unique identifier: 14509154.
