Related Experiment Video
Updated: Sep 30, 2026

The 4-vessel Sampling Approach to Integrative Studies of Human Placental Physiology In Vivo
Published on: August 2, 2017
"United in diversity?" A comparative study of initial midwifery education and practice in 30 European countries
A Ghanchi1, A Luyben2, K Klein3
1Luxembourg Midwifery Innovations in Research and Education (LUMIRE) Research group, Department of Health, Medicine and Life Sciences, Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.
Aim:
To explore initial midwifery education and scope of professional practice across Europe.
Background:
Free movement of professionals is a core value of the European Union, enabling midwives to practice across European countries. The European Directives established minimum standards for midwifery education. However, various health care delivery crises may challenge professional competencies and legal responsibilities.
Design:
An exploratory research design was used to obtain overall insight into various issues not well understood about midwifery education and practice in European countries.
Methods:
A semi-structured questionnaire allowed comparisons between countries to be made using descriptive statistics and descriptive qualitative analysis.
Results:
Thirty of 32 invited countries responded. Data showed variations in midwife density and an aging profile. Bachelor-level was the principle educational model, with programme length and ECTS varying considerably. Substantial heterogeneity was observed in curricula and in the balance between theory, skills, and clinical practice. Content frequently extended European Directives, particularly in public health, evidence-based practice, and reproductive health. Most countries considered competency targets achievable, 37% reported difficulties-especially in numbers of births and suturing. Shortfalls were addressed through simulation or clinical placement solutions.
Conclusion:
European midwifery education has advanced considerably since the introduction of the European Directives. However professional regulation, clinical requirements, and workforce governance remains uneven across countries. Variations in educational models highlight gaps between educational development and practice realities. Developing a competency-based European framework that includes emerging areas of practice, alongside strengthened professional registers and leadership competencies, could support mobility, patient safety and workforce sustainability.
Related Concept Videos
International Nursing Organizations II
The WHO provides expert team support, including funding, vaccines, testing, and treatment tools at the country level to fight...
International Nursing Organizations I
ICN member organizations work to advance the field of nursing and healthcare via policies, partnerships, lobbying, professional...
National Nursing Organizations II
The AACN emphasizes a healthy work environment through six standards to achieve an optimal patient outcome. The standards are appropriate staffing, meaningful recognition, collaboration, authentic leadership, effective communication, and decision-making. In addition, AACN provides certification programs, webinars, journals, and...
Nurses' Legal Responsibilities III
Cultivating a culture of collaboration and mutual respect among nurses transcends mere enhancement...
Current Trends in Nursing I
National Nursing Organizations I