Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 1, 2026

Network Analysis of the Default Mode Network Using Functional Connectivity MRI in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy
Published on: August 5, 2014
Dynamic functional connectivity in left frontal and temporal tumors
Samra Iftikhar1,2, Saeed Rahmani1,2, Amirali Aali1
1Clinical Neuroplasticity Laboratory, Yale University School of Medicine, 330 Cedar Street, New Haven, CT 06510, United States.
Abstract:
This study examined dynamic resting-state functional connectivity and graph-theoretic measures in 71 patients with left intra-axial tumors (40 left frontal lobe tumors and 31 left temporal lobe tumors) and 53 age- and sex-matched healthy controls. Dynamic functional connectivity was estimated across 8 80-s sliding windows, region of interest-to-region of interest Fisher-z connectivity values from 132 atlas regions were harmonized using ComBat, and graph metrics were calculated at a 20% proportional density. The primary within-study comparison was restricted to left frontal lobe tumors and left temporal lobe tumors to avoid the confounding between diagnosis and the public healthy control datasets. In restricted maximum likelihood mixed-effects models with AR(1) within-subject covariance, adjusted for z-scored age, categorical TR, and window, none of the 11 graph metrics showed an overall tumor-location effect (P = 0.219 to 0.928; partial eta-squared < 0.001 to 0.019). However, tumor location-by-window interactions survived correction across 11 metrics for clustering coefficient, transitivity, modularity, and assortativity, at T8, adjusted values were higher in left temporal lobe tumors than left frontal lobe tumors for all 4 metrics. Grade-stratified analyses provided no corrected evidence that grade moderated these temporal location effects, while adjustment for peritumoral edema or standardized log lesion volume did not materially alter the primary tumor-location findings. Secondary comparisons indicated lower integration and altered path-based and centrality measures in tumor groups relative to healthy controls, but diagnosis was partially confounded with acquisition protocol; healthy control-only models identified residual acquisition-batch effects for betweenness centrality and eccentricity after correction. Global connectivity laterality index differences did not survive multiple-comparison correction (minimum q = 0.334) and are interpreted descriptively. These findings distinguish temporally specific topology differences from generalized tumor-location effects and require confirmation in uniformly acquired, clinically characterized cohorts.
More Related Videos
13:12Translational Brain Mapping at the University of Rochester Medical Center: Preserving the Mind Through Personalized Brain Mapping
Published on: August 12, 2019
08:36Dynamic Inter-subject Functional Connectivity Reveals Moment-to-Moment Brain Network Configurations Driven by Continuous or Communication Paradigms
Published on: March 21, 2019