Related Experiment Videos
Two-to-one randomization is associated with increased control-arm patient withdrawal
Boris Freidlin1, Edward L Korn1
1Biometric Research Program, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda MD USA.
Abstract:
Patient withdrawal from a randomized clinical trial before starting the study treatment complicates the interpretation of the trial results, especially if a larger proportion patients withdraw from the control-treatment arm than the experimental-treatment arm. This may happen in an open-label trial if the patients are disappointed with their treatment assignment. It has been hypothesized that two-to-one randomization may lead to more disappointment withdrawals. To investigate this, we examined a cohort of 396 published oncology trials from four journals (2022-2025) to assess the differential pre-treatment withdrawal rates. We found that in 35 open-label trials with two-to-one randomization patients were, on average, 3.72 times more likely to withdraw on the control-treatment arm (95% CI = 2.66 to 5.22). This is a larger relative risk than was seen in the 181 open-label trials with one-to-one randomization, 1.99 (95% CI = 1.67 to 2.37). To avoid differential withdrawal, trials should be blinded when possible.
Related Concept Videos
Randomized Experiments
Simple randomization
Simple...
Blinding
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Completely Randomized and Randomized Block Designs
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast, controlled...
Bioequivalence Experimental Study Designs: Repeated Measures, Cross-Over, Carry-Over, and Latin Square Designs
Crossover Experiments
Crossover designs are performed even with smaller sample sizes since the samples can act as their controls. These are better than simple randomized trials since patients are exposed to all the treatments.