Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

In Vitro Modeling of Fat Deposition in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Published on: July 19, 2024
Histologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Lean Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease
Leyla de Avila1, Khalid M AlNaamani1,2, Margarita Papatheodoridi1,3
1The Global NASH/MASH Council (GNC), Washington, DC.
Importance:
Although metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is traditionally associated with obesity, it is increasingly recognized in individuals with normal weight (ie, lean MASLD).
Objective:
To characterize the clinical, histologic, and prognostic features of lean MASLD, and evaluate the performance of noninvasive tests for advanced fibrosis.
Design, Setting, And Participants:
Multinational, retrospective observational study of adults with biopsy-confirmed MASLD from 41 countries from the Global MASLD project.
Exposures:
Lean vs overweight/obese MASLD, defined by body mass index (BMI) and waist circumference.
Main Outcomes And Measures:
Primary outcomes were all-cause mortality and clinical events (hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic decompensation, liver transplant, death), intermediate outcomes included histologic fibrosis severity, and tests included the Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) score and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography.
Results:
Among 18 326 patients (mean [SD] age, 50.9 [13.1] years; 8714 [47.6%] male), 6.7% were lean by BMI. Among 12 202 patients with waist circumference available, 6.0% were lean by waist circumference (κ = 0.41). Lean MASLD was most prevalent in Asia (11.3% by BMI, 11.7% by waist circumference). Compared with overweight/obese MASLD, lean MASLD had lower prevalence of type 2 diabetes (38.2% vs 48.3%; difference, -10.2% [95% CI, -13.0% to -7.4%]), advanced fibrosis (29.3% vs 37.2%; difference, -7.8% [95% CI, -10.5% to -5.2%]), and Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Activity Scores (mean [SD], 3.96 [1.81] vs 4.41 [1.68]; difference, -0.44 [95% CI, -0.56 to -0.33]). The FIB-4 demonstrated lower accuracy for predicting advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) in lean vs overweight/obese MASLD (area under the curve, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.73-0.79] vs 0.79 [95% CI, 0.78-0.80]; difference, -0.03 [95% CI, -0.06 to 0.00]), while LSM had higher accuracy (area under the curve, 0.87 [95% CI, 0.84-0.90] vs 0.83 [95% CI, 0.82-0.84]; difference, 0.04 [95% CI, 0.01-0.07]). Unadjusted rates per 100 person-years in lean vs overweight/obese MASLD were 1.08 vs 0.91 for all-cause mortality and 1.51 vs 1.43 for clinical events, respectively; lean status was not independently associated with all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.90 [95% CI, 0.69-1.16]) or clinical events (aHR, 0.94 [95% CI, 0.76-1.17]). Advanced fibrosis (F3-F4) was associated with all-cause mortality (1.46 vs 0.77 per 100 person-years; aHR, 2.10 [95% CI, 1.71-2.57]) and clinical events (3.21 vs 0.89 per 100 person-years; aHR, 3.41 [95% CI, 2.90-4.03]).
Conclusions And Relevance:
Lean MASLD represents a distinct phenotype with milder histologic disease but similar clinical outcomes compared with overweight/obese MASLD. Fibrosis severity, rather than body composition, was associated with prognosis and LSM was reliable in lean individuals.
Related Concept Videos
Cirrhosis II: Pathophysiology
Cirrhosis I: Introduction
Ultrasound II: Endoscopic Ultrasound and FibroScan
Endoscopic Ultrasound (EUS):