Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging of Skeletal Muscle Disease
Published on: December 18, 2016
RF Power, B1+rms, and SAR Variation with RF Coils, Conductive Metallic Implants, and Ionic Solutions at 1.5T and 3T
1Rockefeller Neuroscience Institute, Department of Neuroradiology, School of Medicine, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV 26506, USA.
Abstract:
Currently, the time-averaged root-mean-square RF field (B1+rms) and specific absorption rate (SAR) are being evaluated to monitor and control RF-induced heating near conductive metallic implants, such as deep brain stimulation (DBS) leads, during MRI. However, experimental methods to assess the relationship between RF power, B1+rms, and SAR are lacking for RF coils, RF pulse sequences, metallic implants, and ionic solutions. A method is developed to evaluate the variation in RF power, B1+rms, and SAR with RF coils, metallic implants, and ionic solutions using phantoms consisting of water (H2O) and sodium chloride (NaCl) with four ionic concentrations (0, 1, 2, 3%), four metallic wavelengths (0, λ/2, λ, 2λ), two RF coils (body, head), transmit/receive (Tx/Rx) combinations, and five RF pulse flip angles (30, 45, 60, 75, 90 degrees) in two B0 fields (1.5T and 3T). The scanner-reported RF power and SAR varied with RF pulse sequences, RF coils, Tx/Rx, metallic implants, and ionic solutions, whereas B1+rms varied only with RF pulse sequences. The RF power, B1+rms, and SAR relationship depends on RF pulse sequences, RF coils, Tx/Rx, metallic implant wavelengths, and ionic concentrations. SAR (whole-body, head) scaled with RF power by absorption ratios (α) variable with experimental conditions.
Related Concept Videos
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NMR Spectrometers: Radiofrequency Pulses and Pulse Sequences

