Related Experiment Video
Updated: Oct 2, 2026

Following the Dynamics of Structural Variants in Experimentally Evolved Populations
Published on: February 3, 2023
Identifying adaptive variation in spatially structured populations using low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data
Nikunj Goel1,2, Christen M Bossu3, Seorim Yi1
1Department of Statistics and Data Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, USA, 78712.
Abstract:
Successful implementation of evolutionary programs to rescue climatically threatened species requires identification of adaptive variation. Although many genotype-environment association methods have been successful in identifying adaptive variation, current approaches can be improved in two important aspects. First, most existing methods do not account for genotype uncertainty in widely available low-coverage whole-genome sequencing data. Researchers often restrict analysis to loci for which genotypes can be inferred reliably or call the most probable genotype, allowing the use of genotype-based methods. However, discarding data and false genotype calls increase the uncertainty in estimates of genetic variation and can introduce systematic biases. Second, most methods use phenomenological approaches, such as logistic regression, to partition estimated variation into adaptive and non-adaptive components. Consequently, current approaches may fail to account for evolutionary processes, such as migration-selection balance. Structured migration between climatically disparate locations can produce deviations from a smooth S-shape response curve, which can be difficult to accommodate using generalized linear models. To overcome these challenges, we developed a method that accounts for genotype uncertainty in sequencing data and propagates this uncertainty to inform the parameters of an evolutionary model. A key feature of this model is that it describes mechanistically how genetic variation arises from joint interactions between local adaptation, structured migration, mutation, and drift. Our synthetic simulation tests reveal that accounting for genotype uncertainty and structured migration substantially reduces false negatives. We also applied our approach to analyze data on North American rosy-finches (3.7 million SNPs), a high-alpine, climatically threatened clade of bird species.
Related Concept Videos
Evolutionary Relationships through Genome Comparisons
Genome-wide Association Studies-GWAS
GWAS does not require the identification of the target gene involved in...
Comparing Copy Number Variations and SNPs
Copy number variations or CNVs are the structural variations that cover more than 1kb of DNA sequence. The single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP), on the other hand, is a single nucleotide change or a point mutation that is found in more than 1%...
Modern Molecular Taxonomy
Gene Evolution - Fast or Slow?
In contrast, regions which code...
